Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cxf-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cxf-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CFAC3C815 for ; Wed, 7 Jan 2015 19:59:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 21304 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jan 2015 19:59:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cxf-dev-archive@cxf.apache.org Received: (qmail 21234 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jan 2015 19:59:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cxf.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cxf.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cxf.apache.org Received: (qmail 21223 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jan 2015 19:59:41 -0000 Received: from tyr.zones.apache.org (HELO tyr.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.114) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Jan 2015 19:59:41 +0000 Received: by tyr.zones.apache.org (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 1DAA99D2601; Wed, 7 Jan 2015 19:59:41 +0000 (UTC) From: sberyozkin To: dev@cxf.apache.org Reply-To: dev@cxf.apache.org References: In-Reply-To: Subject: [GitHub] cxf pull request: Optimisation usage of URLEncode / URLDecode to U... Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <20150107195941.1DAA99D2601@tyr.zones.apache.org> Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2015 19:59:41 +0000 (UTC) Github user sberyozkin commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/49#issuecomment-69081994 Thanks for this effort. At the moment I'm not certain we need the advanced optimization like this one. Where exactly is a bottleneck ? Perhaps it can be resolved by having a less elaborate fix ? Cheers, Sergey --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastructure@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---