Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-15115-apmail-cxf-dev-archive=cxf.apache.org@cxf.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-cxf-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-cxf-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D8B551788C
	for <apmail-cxf-dev-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Thu,  9 Oct 2014 11:38:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 24295 invoked by uid 500); 9 Oct 2014 11:37:59 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-cxf-dev-archive@cxf.apache.org
Received: (qmail 24164 invoked by uid 500); 9 Oct 2014 11:37:59 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cxf.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@cxf.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@cxf.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@cxf.apache.org>
List-Id: <dev.cxf.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@cxf.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cxf.apache.org
Received: (qmail 24140 invoked by uid 99); 9 Oct 2014 11:37:59 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Oct 2014 11:37:59 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0
	tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of sberyozkin@gmail.com
 designates 74.125.82.44 as permitted sender)
Received: from [74.125.82.44] (HELO mail-wg0-f44.google.com) (74.125.82.44)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Oct 2014 11:37:52 +0000
Received: by mail-wg0-f44.google.com with SMTP id y10so1028835wgg.15
        for <multiple recipients>; Thu, 09 Oct 2014 04:37:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
         :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=6slD+S30o9fZOVSU5yr6BULVjUZYI4wTon6VzETBly0=;
        b=sadEQFLqWXoB3yiLaAikDvOdVtaPH0NaZX8k6xf0kxAgEokAudYIApRBvHtqeAzfJ/
         NtFuxqh+WeDU9k2WbCTpfucfgwyXTPD2Aw6F5iQKSznfpmY8Oc9NHirY2Y22BEI9egXR
         oV4sTbWTtfe726sFAMMIUphIuozlbyfA+h2fLT+3oPwqTu0nyJL6Y6cEILja/8jm2kwj
         zgIp/56FCNqNRXouxDaNXSD8qFgCfplI9msIhZ9G+bACTP7QMTlO1tJ8G1l49v7hMEfC
         2xyt8/a0bJn1Ip6oNg5ma7CsK0FyzQejuVqUwQlHNa2bTg9bPGY5P4FxPXzlrKD8d9pE
         CxWw==
X-Received: by 10.194.58.50 with SMTP id n18mr17008919wjq.47.1412854650862;
        Thu, 09 Oct 2014 04:37:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.7] ([109.255.231.6])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id gw6sm5286884wib.8.2014.10.09.04.37.29
        for <multiple recipients>
        (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
        Thu, 09 Oct 2014 04:37:30 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <54367379.5010109@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 12:37:29 +0100
From: Sergey Beryozkin <sberyozkin@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
 rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@cxf.apache.org, users <users@cxf.apache.org>
Subject: Re: EJB integration for JAX-RS2.0 in CXF
References: 
 <CANXr88+VM-BwEZ3Z=9UwJoZgr5vfaSJcoPiH49zsj_xZ4H5mwQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CANXr88+VM-BwEZ3Z=9UwJoZgr5vfaSJcoPiH49zsj_xZ4H5mwQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

Hi
On 09/10/14 10:06, Bin Zhu wrote:
> Hi,
> Does current CXF support EJB based JAX-RS 2.0 application? If yes, is there
> requirement for EJB container? any additional configuration needed for
> application server? Thanks.
>
>
> Spec for EJB support:
>
> In a product that supports EJBs, an implementation MUST support the use of
> stateless and singleton session
> beans as root resource classes, providers and Application subclasses.
>
No, CXF does not have its own EJB integration project in place yet. CDI 
- yes, Andriy Redko did it. TomEE has it AFAIK.

There was a GSOC project few years back dedicated to it but it was not 
completed.

Might be worth having a light-weight CXF JAX-RS 2.0 EJB integration 
project as well, that would have CXF offering a complete integration 
support...

Cheers, Sergey