Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cxf.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@cxf.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy includes SPF record at
 spf.trusted-forwarder.org)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\))
Subject: Re: CXF 3.0 builds tomorrow....
From: Daniel Kulp <dkulp@apache.org>
In-Reply-To: <537119D4.2010902@sosnoski.com>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 15:01:03 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <7E7962F1-2F16-48B3-B933-8C89C12AB3C3@apache.org>
References: <BA8E4FDE-471A-4375-95F9-BCB861D9164A@apache.org>
 <537119D4.2010902@sosnoski.com>
To: dev@cxf.apache.org


On May 12, 2014, at 2:58 PM, Dennis Sosnoski <dms@sosnoski.com> wrote:

> Hi Dan,
>=20
> RM is broken for oneway operations with a decoupled endpoint at =
present. I'm trying to track the problem down, and Aki has also taken a =
look. If I can't fix it myself I'll add a test case so you can take a =
look.
>=20
> I don't know that this would qualify as a show stopper, but it's =
pretty significant and should be an easy fix.


OK.  Thanks!    If you need to me look, feel free to add an @Ignored =
test case.


Dan


>=20
>  - Dennis
>=20
> On 05/13/2014 02:38 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>> Now that we finally have email back (and thus can review/track =
commits, issues, call votes, etc=85) I plan on doing the 3.0 builds real =
soon, hopefully tomorrow.    It looks like everything major is now done. =
  All snapshots are resolved, the tests seems to be passing, the RM =
issues are resolved, etc=85   Thus, I=92d like to get this out.
>>=20
>> If you have anything that would be considered a show stopper, let me =
know ASAP.
>>=20
>> Thanks!
>>=20
>=20

--=20
Daniel Kulp
dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com