Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cxf-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cxf-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B973311E26 for ; Tue, 20 May 2014 04:06:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 35505 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2014 04:06:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cxf-dev-archive@cxf.apache.org Received: (qmail 35342 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2014 04:06:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cxf.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cxf.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cxf.apache.org Received: (qmail 35162 invoked by uid 99); 20 May 2014 04:06:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 May 2014 04:06:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of freeman.fang@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.46 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.46] (HELO mail-pa0-f46.google.com) (209.85.220.46) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 May 2014 04:06:16 +0000 Received: by mail-pa0-f46.google.com with SMTP id kq14so6631194pab.5 for ; Mon, 19 May 2014 21:05:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:mime-version:content-type:subject:date:in-reply-to:to :references:message-id; bh=XSMhPC3Izbpb+ndI//slOrtPMbs8cvOPGXryTDdPD7w=; b=FTf20ikUEas4sFMl+VezBEsAgG83dyUOiyqH7Bc92M1V25x8WZpnbflZaq5/7pTaaB lVlF+1ukM19bRa+bRCqQ4BFcOiEHzm3SXDfML2NKe9mSVDRSziqM4RFdcx3EuNpSotKL GI5koOEbqgxaRd3xEr14Mfp8ZE4GGG18mTT+O4784810FuoO65bvZZGWQ5N7raUUSceN GEnDCTZ07VuyAgY+i96yBdOfe1jy117Y9QUQyQh1mgvQ7he/FgC3wyDa123X1xklhCyC 7MP5gwvOtSRXdMXV+zdoXraXmBeIk+Huqbp/Eb3AN36aTbFaSUG7OPP89uSDXS8tIkZ8 b4HQ== X-Received: by 10.68.196.202 with SMTP id io10mr47296587pbc.149.1400558751884; Mon, 19 May 2014 21:05:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([123.116.130.80]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ja8sm492724pbd.3.2014.05.19.21.02.53 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 19 May 2014 21:05:51 -0700 (PDT) From: Freeman Fang Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1280) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_0D295E7C-A7E2-49BE-A4A8-AB126EF17D5D" Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Short term plans/branching.... Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 12:02:25 +0800 In-Reply-To: <537A8207.8020104@sosnoski.com> To: dev@cxf.apache.org References: <330026BE-3799-4F6D-8459-092B03295F8F@apache.org> <689760432.20140519145451@gmail.com> <7B582DCE-AA0E-4816-B6A3-1A1467A03751@apache.org> <537A8207.8020104@sosnoski.com> Message-Id: <204B3AB0-5A38-464F-8E49-AC7CAF9B9430@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1280) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --Apple-Mail=_0D295E7C-A7E2-49BE-A4A8-AB126EF17D5D Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 +1 for Dan's plan And for the JiBX with JDK8, how about we just document in the release = notes that some optional components like JiBX won't support JDK8 due to = they are kind of obsolete? =EF=BC=8D=EF=BC=8D=EF=BC=8D=EF=BC=8D=EF=BC=8D=EF=BC=8D=EF=BC=8D=EF=BC=8D=EF= =BC=8D=EF=BC=8D=EF=BC=8D=EF=BC=8D=EF=BC=8D Freeman(Yue) Fang Red Hat, Inc.=20 FuseSource is now part of Red Hat On 2014-5-20, at =E4=B8=8A=E5=8D=886:13, Dennis Sosnoski wrote: > I don't think the JiBX support should be any concern. I haven't been = maintaining the JiBX code for some time, and the Java 8 issue is = probably the last nail in the coffin. >=20 > A new release of BCEL might let JiBX limp along a little longer, but = BCEL has been obsolete for a long time. I would have liked to strip out = the BCEL usage and replace it with ASM, which would also have been cause = to clean up some of the nastiest code in the project, but without some = financial support that's not going to happen. >=20 > So I'd say just drop JiBX support going forward. >=20 > - Dennis >=20 > On 05/20/2014 07:26 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: >> On May 19, 2014, at 2:54 PM, Andriy Redko wrote: >>=20 >>> >Hi Dan, >>> > >>> >Excellent plan! One question though: following recent discussions = on the list, >>> >there is strong interest in Java 8 support but we know some issues = have to be resolved. >>> >Do you think we can at least investigate Java 8 support and be = ready as much as we can? >> I know Willem and I have both been doing a bunch of experiments with = Java8. The main blocker we have right now is all the JIBX related stuff = as the JIBX plugin cannot work with Java8. It=E2=80=99s pretty much out = of our hands (and not really even in the JIBX=E2=80=99s folks hands) as = it would require a release of BCEL from the Apache Commons folks first. = I*think* if a BCEL release was made, we could at least build CXF with = Java8. That would leave a couple remaining issues: >=20 --Apple-Mail=_0D295E7C-A7E2-49BE-A4A8-AB126EF17D5D--