cxf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sergey Beryozkin <sberyoz...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: ask for schedule for formal JAX-RS2.0 support
Date Wed, 26 Mar 2014 12:20:23 GMT
I added a dedicated section:

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CXF20DOC/JAX-RS#JAX-RS-JAX-RSCompliance

Sergey

On 26/03/14 10:40, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
> Hi
> On 26/03/14 08:25, Bin Zhu wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I noticed from the following site that CXF 3.0 haven't claim formal
>> JAX-RS
>> 2.0 compliance yet, is there any rough schedule when will it be formal
>> supported? Thanks.
>>
>> http://cxf.apache.org/docs/jax-rs.html
>>
>> CXF 3.0.0 completely implements JAX-RS 2.0 including new Client API
>> and has
>> been fully tested against the first JAX-RS 2.0 TCK which became available
>> to Apache (jaxrstck-2.0_26-Feb-2013).
>>
>> Note: CXF 3.0.0 can not claim at the moment the formal JAX-RS 2.0
>> compliance due to the fact that the final JAX-RS 2.0 TCK has not been
>> available to Apache.
>>
> The formal compliance cam be claimed only if the implementation has
> passed the final TCK. Unfortunately Apache has lost the access to Oracle
> TCK and therefore we can not claim a formal compliance due to the fact
> we can't run Apache CXF against the final TCK.
>
> My personal point of view: CXF JAX-RS 2.0 implementation is technically
> sound with respect to supporting the 'letter' of JAX-RS 2.0. Testing
> against the Feb 2013 TCK has definitely helped too.
>
> The remaining known issue is:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-5650
>
> Of course, the final TCK may have the tests exposing some CXF issues.
> I'm hoping the users will help us to trace such issues if any in the
> absence of the final TCK package.
>
> Some EE-specific JAX-RS 2.0ptions (notably EJB) are not directly
> supported in CXF; Andriy Redko has done the initial CDI support which
> covers the relevant JAX-RS 2.0 text but it is a work in progress. I will
> be updating the wiki about it all too,
>
> I updated this page yesterday due to some external concerns about Apache
> CXF being not factually correct about it. I'm kind of impressed we've
> got the query on the dev list the next day :-).
>
> Cheers, Sergey
>
>


-- 
Sergey Beryozkin

Talend Community Coders
http://coders.talend.com/

Blog: http://sberyozkin.blogspot.com

Mime
View raw message