cxf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jeff Genender <jgenen...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Flip to git...
Date Wed, 19 Feb 2014 02:58:43 GMT
Does anyone have a reason to drive a horse and cart instead of a car? ;-)

j/k

Thanks for getting this together... this is a big move for our community.

Jeff

> Daniel Kulp <mailto:dkulp@apache.org>
> February 18, 2014 at 7:53 PM
> Just as an FYI:
>
> I filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-7348 so the ball 
> is now rolling in INFRA’s hands.
>
> While filing that, I realized we haven’t talked about the other 4 sub 
> projects: buildutils, xjc-utils, fediz, and dosgi. We have git mirrors 
> for dosgi and fediz so we could flip those over quickly if we wanted 
> to. buildutils and xjc-utils would be a bit more involved as we’d have 
> to create the mirrors.
>
> Does anyone have any reasons NOT to migrate everything over? Would the 
> folks working on fedix/dosgi prefer to stay SVN or move over to git?
>
> Dan
>
>
>
>
>
> Daniel Kulp <mailto:dkulp@apache.org>
> February 18, 2014 at 6:47 AM
> We seem to have had consensus to flip to git after the milestone2 
> release. Now that that is out, I’m going to start that process. It may 
> take a few days as we need to run a bunch of commands on the current 
> repo to clean it out and then I have to work with infra to get it 
> moved over and such. However, I don’t want to stop development momentum.
>
> For now, can we NOT merge anything back onto the fixes branches? Just 
> keep committing to trunk. After the new repo goes live, we can 
> pull/cherry-pick any “new” things from the old trunk location and then 
> merge them back to various branches. That should make it a bit easier 
> as there will only be a single branch to worry about re-syncing after 
> the switch.
>
> Thanks!
>

Mime
View raw message