cxf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrei Shakirin <ashaki...@talend.com>
Subject RE: Discuss: Switching cxf to git
Date Fri, 24 Jan 2014 08:29:19 GMT
> >
> > The downside is for the files that have existed since 2.1, a "git
> > blame" and log and such will only go back to 2.1. Blame will list me
> > as the person for any lines that have existed since 2.1 (since I did
> > the "release:prepare" for 2.1 and all the commits prior to that are
> > squashed up into there). We could go back a little further than 2.1 if
> > we feel it's overly important. Or, we could even move up to 2.2 or
> > later if we feel it's not at all important. :-)
> 
> Sounds good to me. Of course it is important that we still know the history of
> older files for legal reasons. I think this should work though if we keep the
> old svn repo in read only mode. For any other practical uses I think 2.1 should
> be fine as the oldest history.

That sounds reasonable for me as well. Glad to work with "pure" git in CXF.

Regards,
Andrei.

> 
> Christian
> 
> 
> --
> Christian Schneider
> http://www.liquid-reality.de
> 
> Open Source Architect
> http://www.talend.com


Mime
View raw message