cxf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>
Subject Re: ehcache version used in cxf build
Date Thu, 04 Jul 2013 12:48:35 GMT

On Jul 4, 2013, at 5:33 AM, Jason Pell <jason@pellcorp.com> wrote:

> If we don't need to support 2.5.1 as well then the changes would be simpler
> just need to use new api methods to avoid the 4577 issue.

I'd be OK making 2.5.2 a minimum if that helps.  That's a "patch" release via it's number
(though obviously not).

Dan


> On Jul 4, 2013 6:23 PM, "Oliver Wulff" <owulff@talend.com> wrote:
> 
>> IMHO, it would make sense to support a newer version of ehcache for
>> 2.7/2.6 as service implementations usually rely on other 3rd parties which
>> use ehcache as well (hibernate).
>> 
>> Thanks
>> Oli
>> 
>> ________________________________________
>> From: Daniel Kulp [dkulp@apache.org]
>> Sent: 04 July 2013 00:54
>> To: dev@cxf.apache.org
>> Cc: Aki Yoshida
>> Subject: Re: ehcache version used in cxf build
>> 
>> On Jul 3, 2013, at 6:01 PM, Jason Pell <jason@pellcorp.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Sorry guys i never got back to this one. Would be easier i should think
>> to
>>> fix this for 3.0 and no longer support the old version at all thus no
>>> reflection magic.
>> 
>> Well, I'd LIKE to still be able to run 2.7/2.6 with the newer versions of
>> ehcache if at all possible.    But yes, for 3.0, we could just go with the
>> newest as a minimum.
>> 
>> Dan
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Jul 4, 2013 7:04 AM, "Daniel Kulp" <dkulp@apache.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Aki,
>>>> 
>>>> This was on my todo list to look at, just never have managed to find the
>>>> time.   There is an issue logged about it:
>>>> 
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-4577
>>>> 
>>>> If you have time, feel free to grab it and see what you can find out.
>>>> 
>>>> Dan
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Jul 3, 2013, at 4:58 PM, Aki Yoshida <elakito@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> cxf's trunk and branches (2.7.x, 2.6.x, etc) all use ehcache 2.5.1 and
>>>>> create the karaf feature with the corresponding smx's bundle version.
>> But
>>>>> the version range specified in the package imports is set as
>>>> [2.5.0,3.0.0),
>>>>> so we could use a newer version in runtime.
>>>>> 
>>>>> As ehcache 2.5.1 is rather old (from 2012-01) and there are newer
>>>> versions
>>>>> such as 2.6.6 (2013-05) and 2.7.2 (2013-07) which is already an
>>>>> osgi-bundle,  I was wondering if we can use a newer version for trunk's
>>>>> build. There are some disappeared classes and other changes, but the
>>>> usage
>>>>> in cxf seem to be compatible with these versions. I tried both 2.6.6
>> and
>>>>> 2.7.2, and the build itself seems to run without problems.
>>>>> 
>>>>> How do you think about upgrading ehcache to ehcache 2.7.2 for trunk so
>>>> that
>>>>> we can test cxf not just against old ehcache 2.5.1?
>>>>> 
>>>>> As comparison, camel trunk uses ehcache 2.7.0, while 2.11.x uses 2.5.2.
>>>>> 
>>>>> regards, aki
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Daniel Kulp
>>>> dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
>>>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
>>>> 
>>>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Daniel Kulp
>> dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
>> 
>> 

-- 
Daniel Kulp
dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com


Mime
View raw message