cxf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Oliver Wulff <owu...@talend.com>
Subject RE: ehcache version used in cxf build
Date Thu, 04 Jul 2013 08:22:49 GMT
IMHO, it would make sense to support a newer version of ehcache for 2.7/2.6 as service implementations
usually rely on other 3rd parties which use ehcache as well (hibernate).

Thanks
Oli

________________________________________
From: Daniel Kulp [dkulp@apache.org]
Sent: 04 July 2013 00:54
To: dev@cxf.apache.org
Cc: Aki Yoshida
Subject: Re: ehcache version used in cxf build

On Jul 3, 2013, at 6:01 PM, Jason Pell <jason@pellcorp.com> wrote:

> Sorry guys i never got back to this one. Would be easier i should think to
> fix this for 3.0 and no longer support the old version at all thus no
> reflection magic.

Well, I'd LIKE to still be able to run 2.7/2.6 with the newer versions of ehcache if at all
possible.    But yes, for 3.0, we could just go with the newest as a minimum.

Dan



> On Jul 4, 2013 7:04 AM, "Daniel Kulp" <dkulp@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Aki,
>>
>> This was on my todo list to look at, just never have managed to find the
>> time.   There is an issue logged about it:
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-4577
>>
>> If you have time, feel free to grab it and see what you can find out.
>>
>> Dan
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Jul 3, 2013, at 4:58 PM, Aki Yoshida <elakito@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> cxf's trunk and branches (2.7.x, 2.6.x, etc) all use ehcache 2.5.1 and
>>> create the karaf feature with the corresponding smx's bundle version. But
>>> the version range specified in the package imports is set as
>> [2.5.0,3.0.0),
>>> so we could use a newer version in runtime.
>>>
>>> As ehcache 2.5.1 is rather old (from 2012-01) and there are newer
>> versions
>>> such as 2.6.6 (2013-05) and 2.7.2 (2013-07) which is already an
>>> osgi-bundle,  I was wondering if we can use a newer version for trunk's
>>> build. There are some disappeared classes and other changes, but the
>> usage
>>> in cxf seem to be compatible with these versions. I tried both 2.6.6 and
>>> 2.7.2, and the build itself seems to run without problems.
>>>
>>> How do you think about upgrading ehcache to ehcache 2.7.2 for trunk so
>> that
>>> we can test cxf not just against old ehcache 2.5.1?
>>>
>>> As comparison, camel trunk uses ehcache 2.7.0, while 2.11.x uses 2.5.2.
>>>
>>> regards, aki
>>
>> --
>> Daniel Kulp
>> dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
>>
>>

--
Daniel Kulp
dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com


Mime
View raw message