Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cxf.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@cxf.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of asoldano@redhat.com designates
 209.132.183.28 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <5198E021.3060304@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 19 May 2013 16:22:25 +0200
From: Alessio Soldano <asoldano@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US;
 rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110428 Fedora/3.1.10-1.fc13 Thunderbird/3.1.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Daniel Kulp <dkulp@apache.org>
CC: dev@cxf.apache.org,
        =?windows-1252?Q?Jan_Marti=9Aka?=
 <jmartisk@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: WS-Eventing for CXF
References: <1639823862.15156742.1362743103061.JavaMail.root@redhat.com>
 <518BC31F.8060909@redhat.com>
 <1689057550.9681549.1368171190833.JavaMail.root@redhat.com>
 <5190DC5D.4050601@redhat.com> <5197737F.5000106@redhat.com>
 <2723EB77-D0C8-4E34-A79D-D043C7598D82@apache.org>
In-Reply-To: <2723EB77-D0C8-4E34-A79D-D043C7598D82@apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi Dan,
sure, I'll ask Jan to fill out the software grant form, I believe he's
the IP owner for the patch he's done, being that part of his thesis
work, but I'll leave him the last word. I assume there's no IP issue for
my few additions so far over his patch. Btw, is a new JIRA required for
Jan's patch, or can he use the CXF-5023 one?
Thanks
Alessio

On 05/18/2013 02:42 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> 
> Alessio,
> 
> This is large enough that it likely would require a grant like we just did for the XKMS stuff.   Especially since Jan isn't already a committer.   Can you have Jan create a JIRA and attach a patch to it. 
> 
> Who owns the IP for this at this point?  Is it Jan or RedHat?   Whomever it is would need to fill out:
> 
> http://www.apache.org/licenses/software-grant.txt
> 
> and send that in.  (Exhibit A would just point to the JIRA attachment above and also have the MD5 of the patch).
> 
> I just want to make sure we do this right and all the i's dotted and such.  Thanks!
> 
> Dan
> 
> 
> On May 18, 2013, at 8:26 AM, Alessio Soldano <asoldano@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
>>
>> On 05/13/2013 02:28 PM, Alessio Soldano wrote:
>>> Btw, if no notification
>>> WSDL is provided and wrapped delivery is selected, according to the spec
>>> the client (event sink) must implement the generic WSDL in Appendix D
>>> (which has an operation accepting
>>> {http://www.w3.org/2011/03/ws-evt}EventType as input message and that's
>>> basically a sequence of xsd:any).
>>
>> I've committed to trunk an initial implementation of the spec which is
>> basically the work by Jan plus some fixes, the main one basically being
>> the wrapped delivery impl as per explanation above.
>>
>> We can now move to reasoning about the ws-event descriptions support; I
>> have a few idea and will be sharing them here next week.
>> I'll likely also go on with few additional cleanup / enhancements.
>>
>> Ref jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-5023
>>
>> Cheers
>> Alessio
>>
>> -- 
>> Alessio Soldano
>> Web Service Lead, JBoss
> 


-- 
Alessio Soldano
Web Service Lead, JBoss