cxf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Freeman Fang <freeman.f...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: woodstox mandatory?
Date Tue, 02 Apr 2013 07:40:20 GMT
Hi,

I believe it's just compile time dependency, during runtime, you still can use any other stax
parser for now.

What's the error you run into?
-------------
Freeman(Yue) Fang

Red Hat, Inc. 
FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
Web: http://fusesource.com | http://www.redhat.com/
Twitter: freemanfang
Blog: http://freemanfang.blogspot.com
http://blog.sina.com.cn/u/1473905042
weibo: @Freeman小屋

On 2013-4-2, at 下午3:19, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> seems woodstox is now mandatory to use cxf (tested with v2.6.7) because
> of org.apache.cxf.staxutils.StaxUtils
> 
> is it normal?
> 
> in TomEE we were remove it by default so basically it means we can't upgrade
> 
> *Romain Manni-Bucau*
> *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
> *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
> *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message