cxf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>
Subject Re: CXF-4805: what's up with OPTIONS
Date Tue, 05 Feb 2013 20:19:25 GMT

On Feb 5, 2013, at 8:38 AM, Benson Margulies <bimargulies@gmail.com> wrote:

> Am I write in believeing that OPTIONS verbs should be intercepted and rejected?

Assuming you are talking about SOAP, most likely all verbs other than POST (and empty verb
to account for transports like JMS/tcp/etc...) should be intercepted.

The QUESTION is whether a 4xx HTTP error code should be returned with an empty body or a normal
soap fault created on a 500 error code.  I'm not really sure about that.



-- 
Daniel Kulp
dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com


Mime
View raw message