Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cxf-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cxf-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 13266D101 for ; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 12:44:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 63136 invoked by uid 500); 10 Oct 2012 12:44:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cxf-dev-archive@cxf.apache.org Received: (qmail 62867 invoked by uid 500); 10 Oct 2012 12:44:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cxf.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cxf.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cxf.apache.org Received: (qmail 62543 invoked by uid 99); 10 Oct 2012 12:44:41 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 12:44:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of sberyozkin@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.169 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.217.169] (HELO mail-lb0-f169.google.com) (209.85.217.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 12:44:36 +0000 Received: by mail-lb0-f169.google.com with SMTP id k6so447467lbo.0 for ; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 05:44:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=WJbzHq41d2G2hb4E0+5hW/KEP7YgwMVlN9wrTl9fy3c=; b=nEyMuXN7RJKD6gyiE4531zAaqghBMcPtHIu6uOeVVqIzESr2pvBAxvKLej49vZFvoj NP2BQuL/OpvYrWGTt/OteA60skVmxtpkpBnKKCbUdACpMlTTpBXpzhxfKKactygCsI6d c9/aha4FxJqhmOmUVXYhXKqKlupIWu1HmwoLqRLkc4a3OLzFtlpznKh/f+rpyBD9m6b3 qAOwvwR0243GaRa+/KflZLLvBDHTY9KTSQ23QNMQewRY394C+S+GZfFVgLQ4x5HrGOWr GVwOCPRZ3XESpQ1MgSSuDcLg8ZEnm+OKPtA/hfmoEcBjDhJG8S/28gBYJK3P/u4OclNz FEwA== Received: by 10.112.38.134 with SMTP id g6mr9484838lbk.39.1349873054948; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 05:44:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.5] ([89.100.141.71]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id lr17sm433348lab.12.2012.10.10.05.44.14 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 10 Oct 2012 05:44:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <50756D9D.5040705@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 13:44:13 +0100 From: Sergey Beryozkin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cxf.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] 2.4.x EOL? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 Sergey >> >> On Oct 6, 2012, at 5:54 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: >> >>> With 2.7.0 coming out real soon (voting on now), I'd like to discuss >> whether we should make 2.4.10 the last for the 2.4.x line. 2.4.0 was >> released 18 months ago. >>> >>> Last month, 2.4.x accounted for about 12% of the downloads from central, >> but that's inline with the 11% for 2.3.x which we don't support. (Almost >> 50% are on 2.6.x already. Great to see people updating and keeping >> current.) Of the 12%, less than 10% of those were for 2.4.9 and 2.4.8 >> (almost 75% were for 2.4.4 and lower) which shows very few people updating >> on the 2.4.x line (which is concerning due to the security implications) or >> if they are updating, they are moving to the more recent branches. >>> >>> Thoughts? >>> >>> -- >>> Daniel Kulp >>> dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog >>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com >>> >> >> > > -- Sergey Beryozkin Talend Community Coders http://coders.talend.com/ Blog: http://sberyozkin.blogspot.com