cxf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Colm O hEigeartaigh <cohei...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] 2.4.x EOL?
Date Mon, 08 Oct 2012 12:57:25 GMT
+1 from me.

Colm.

On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Jeff Genender <jgenender@apache.org> wrote:

> I'm all for EOLing 2.4.x and its a long time coming…
>
> Jeff
>
> On Oct 6, 2012, at 5:54 AM, Daniel Kulp <dkulp@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > With 2.7.0 coming out real soon (voting on now), I'd like to discuss
> whether we should make 2.4.10 the last for the 2.4.x line.   2.4.0 was
> released 18 months ago.
> >
> > Last month, 2.4.x accounted for about 12% of the downloads from central,
> but that's inline with the 11% for 2.3.x which we don't support.   (Almost
> 50% are on 2.6.x already.  Great to see people updating and keeping
> current.)     Of the 12%, less than 10% of those were for 2.4.9 and 2.4.8
>  (almost 75% were for 2.4.4 and lower) which shows very few people updating
> on the 2.4.x line (which is concerning due to the security implications) or
> if they are updating, they are moving to the more recent branches.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > --
> > Daniel Kulp
> > dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
> > Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
> >
>
>


-- 
Colm O hEigeartaigh

Talend Community Coder
http://coders.talend.com

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message