Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cxf-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cxf-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D06719AB1 for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 09:25:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 49329 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jun 2012 09:25:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cxf-dev-archive@cxf.apache.org Received: (qmail 49074 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jun 2012 09:25:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cxf.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cxf.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cxf.apache.org Received: (qmail 49030 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jun 2012 09:25:20 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 09:25:20 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO mail-ob0-f169.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username coheigea, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 09:25:20 +0000 Received: by obhx4 with SMTP id x4so2191813obh.0 for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 02:25:19 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.19.196 with SMTP id h4mr1153564oee.56.1340357119372; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 02:25:19 -0700 (PDT) Reply-To: coheigea@apache.org Received: by 10.182.209.103 with HTTP; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 02:25:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 10:25:19 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Possible contribution of XKMS server (Key Information and Key Registration Protocols ) From: Colm O hEigeartaigh To: dev@cxf.apache.org Cc: Daniel Kulp Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8ff1c5f4f8ee5804c30c35dd --e89a8ff1c5f4f8ee5804c30c35dd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Andrei, I think an XKMS server would be a useful component of CXF. I guess it would go into the services module where the STS is as well. What kind of dependencies will the project have? Will you also be contributing an XKMS client? Colm. On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Andrei Shakirin wrote: > Hi Dan & Colm, > > In next months we are going to implement, extend and improve XKMS server > (key management) as part as custom project. > It will include both Key Information and Key Registration Protocols > implementations with LDAP backend. > Actually it seems to be possible to implement XKMS under Apache license. > Questions: from your point of view: does it make sense to contribute XKMS > server in CXF in the same way as STS? Or is there project that fit better > for this contribution (Syncope, etc)? What is necessary to care about to > prepare the contribution? > > Regards, > Andrei. > -- Colm O hEigeartaigh Talend Community Coder http://coders.talend.com --e89a8ff1c5f4f8ee5804c30c35dd--