cxf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Colm O hEigeartaigh <cohei...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Branch for 2.6.x, trunk thoughts...
Date Tue, 05 Jun 2012 09:11:37 GMT
+1.

I intend on introducing streaming WS-Security support in 2.7, which will
depend on Santuario 2.0 and WSS4J 2.0, both of which are slated to require
JDK 1.6.

Colm.

On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Daniel Kulp <dkulp@apache.org> wrote:

>
> With 2.6.1 hopefully going out shortly, I'd like to get peoples thoughts
> about creating a 2.6.x-fixes branch and changing trunk to target 2.7.  Here
> is a list of some things I'd like to start thinking about for 2.7:
>
> 1)  Drop support for Java 5 - this may be a bit contentious.  :-)  It would
> simplify the poms a little bit, allow use of @Override, remove some jars
> from the lib dir, etc... The bigger issue is that several of the things we
> test with and depend on are now Java 6+ such as ActiveMQ and gwt and such
> so
> we've been stuck on older versions.
>
> 2) Async http client - this is been on my "maybe next version of CXF" for
> quite a while.  Since 2.3.x I think.   Maybe I'll actually get to it.   :-)
> Would definitely help with some of the Camel integration scenarios.
>
> 3) WS-Discovery - really two parts to this.   Runtime support to broadcast
> availability and discover endpoints is the first part.   Second part MAY be
> a simple WS-Discovery proxy service for /services.
>
> 4) SOAP/UDP - Required for #3.
>
> 5) Possible re-write of the http-jetty transport to base it off the Servlet
> transport or similar so it can take more advantage of things like the
> services list, etc...   Additionally, that may make it easier to create an
> http-tomcat transport (which people DID ask about at CamelOne BTW).
>
> Those are the things *I've* been thinking on and off about.  Obviously the
> other folks around here may have additional things.    I'm sure Colm has
> some security things, Sergey has some REST things, etc....  :-)
>
> So I guess the big question is: anyone OBJECT to creating the 2.6.x-fixes
> branch now?
>
> --
> Daniel Kulp
> dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
>
>


-- 
Colm O hEigeartaigh

Talend Community Coder
http://coders.talend.com

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message