Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cxf-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cxf-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DC90E90F6 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 10:43:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 83874 invoked by uid 500); 24 Apr 2012 10:43:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cxf-dev-archive@cxf.apache.org Received: (qmail 83531 invoked by uid 500); 24 Apr 2012 10:43:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cxf.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cxf.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cxf.apache.org Received: (qmail 83503 invoked by uid 99); 24 Apr 2012 10:43:09 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 10:43:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,URI_HEX X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of bimargulies@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.49 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.49] (HELO mail-wg0-f49.google.com) (74.125.82.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 10:43:04 +0000 Received: by wgbdr1 with SMTP id dr1so449630wgb.6 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 03:42:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Cr/7gzxmHvJ7XEt/yMK9VURUvZkDek+jFGE28g+UAhM=; b=LZCriVUrVFU9FdvodpUi3e0tkUfmegm37tKCek4hAtJi9YPr+pM1hjF5zeBoNz13ej khqmHnlFfYZpBKNkX7ccRwLz4hcsXFRsQxkoXS1oice+4b1gOg6d1MVg031EHc8p7zHy DG23EdIATLyY/pjBAzy2dP0KpUDQacNSUNQTvFEVcF+PoZIZWNgG6SqJAdFbH4ksjMak pnfEI6lYocSxM9N97ZVXL77fZmYcTEL4BwJXOANmV+RSC5Wv04uulkZKwVkl3/chLGj5 VMsHnPsCAmEawFvOXdqoXYdroM4w1ANPpXm2ANknT1x71a7GIMk71esXPTqXI1jyroMt CBkw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.8.231 with SMTP id u7mr16398141wia.9.1335264163382; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 03:42:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.180.96.33 with HTTP; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 03:42:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 06:42:43 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Tomcat embedding From: Benson Margulies To: dev@cxf.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 5:57 AM, Freeman Fang wrot= e: > Hi Benson, > > May not answer you question directly about the tomcat embedding. > You mentioned that the =C2=A0jetty bugs that close 'idle' connections, = =C2=A0I ran > into a similar issue months ago, and setMaxIdleTime on jetty can perfectl= y > resolve it, not sure it's exactly same problem you encounter with jetty, = but > it's worthy of checking. > Please take a look at [1] to get more details. > > [1]http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/CXF-retrying-an-operation-td5072484.ht= ml#a5074035 Recently, that problem returned to us regardless of our setting of maxIdleTime. I fear a new Jetty bug. > Freeman > > > > On 2012-4-23, at =E4=B8=8B=E5=8D=8810:41, Benson Margulies wrote: > >> Last year, I took a look at tomcat as an alternative to Jetty for >> embedding purposes. >> >> I ran aground, I was just too ignorant. >> >> Since I seem, again, to be hitting jetty bugs that close 'idle' >> connections inappropriately, I've got myself interested again. >> >> Is anyone who has a grip on server transports willing to help me out? > > > --------------------------------------------- > Freeman Fang > > FuseSource > Email:ffang@fusesource.com > Web: fusesource.com > Twitter: freemanfang > Blog: http://freemanfang.blogspot.com > http://blog.sina.com.cn/u/1473905042 > weibo: http://weibo.com/u/1473905042 > > > > > > > > > >