Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cxf-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cxf-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BE7629812 for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 08:00:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 59117 invoked by uid 500); 29 Mar 2012 08:00:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cxf-dev-archive@cxf.apache.org Received: (qmail 58628 invoked by uid 500); 29 Mar 2012 07:59:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cxf.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cxf.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cxf.apache.org Received: (qmail 58582 invoked by uid 99); 29 Mar 2012 07:59:57 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 07:59:57 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO mail-ob0-f169.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username coheigea, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 07:59:56 +0000 Received: by obbta14 with SMTP id ta14so3005114obb.0 for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 00:59:56 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.3.6 with SMTP id 6mr31302034oey.35.1333007996055; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 00:59:56 -0700 (PDT) Reply-To: coheigea@apache.org Received: by 10.182.14.234 with HTTP; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 00:59:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <79AB4452999C844D9920E0363533273111FF91@S10BE002.SH10.lan> References: <79AB4452999C844D9920E0363533273111FF91@S10BE002.SH10.lan> Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 08:59:55 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Move JAX-RS claims classes to frontend independent module rt/security From: Colm O hEigeartaigh To: dev@cxf.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable +1. Colm. On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 7:06 AM, Oliver Wulff wrote: > Hi all > > I'd like to start working on the RBAC (see mail "Role based access contro= l with SAML in CXF") and the Claims support for JAX-WS. Sergey has already = implemented that for JAX-RS. > > I'd propose to move these classes (claims, annotations) to a frontend ind= ependent module like rt/security thus it can be used by JAX-WS and JAX-RS. = To get this done for 2.6 would be very good. Otherwise, we can do this for = 2.7 earliest. I'd like to avoid in having different Claims classes for the = same purpose when using JAX-RS or JAX-WS. > > What do you think? > > Thanks > Oli > > > > > ------ > > Oliver Wulff > > Blog: http://owulff.blogspot.com > Solution Architect > http://coders.talend.com > > Talend Application Integration Division http://= www.talend.com --=20 Colm O hEigeartaigh Talend Community Coder http://coders.talend.com