Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cxf-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cxf-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D1E769927 for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 21:05:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 34461 invoked by uid 500); 28 Mar 2012 21:05:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cxf-dev-archive@cxf.apache.org Received: (qmail 34399 invoked by uid 500); 28 Mar 2012 21:05:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cxf.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cxf.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cxf.apache.org Received: (qmail 34352 invoked by uid 99); 28 Mar 2012 21:05:01 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 21:05:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of sberyozkin@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.169 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.169] (HELO mail-we0-f169.google.com) (74.125.82.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 21:04:55 +0000 Received: by werj55 with SMTP id j55so1166830wer.0 for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 14:04:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=tRJsXcQqMCRLo3favNTblwQ07wvvmfvvYrOTjvptL9c=; b=MdeeowoevVFRBo12Eyps8Qey7A5v2Nxan7oQxt7nATxvRanYtdWHXBCAmqBUcZoq2n hOVwWOm0WSOC2NuPUAPEaDldbv+9CSzAlHwF4YeATyzR5ftLsSv0WKJJD9BHnlDujUIG 4dRrxjE45ZiZkFAdDw5bLs6qMxT6gb4peVFi7IMjWfaO6HwqMXSGNdMsEfqeqckiT1sz EijQCwLrnRAw+PUy9wQ5xO1bTIh+VRyvcS1aN370RjsQSQu3Sos04cEjNOQTNQ7Hu4IQ 6KOMDH3avXWUVWq0e1FKcXyhWiGb4SmY6ypuO3kMn7CcX4BDC487JaOBcHvmMKX7iZyA sYVg== Received: by 10.180.102.100 with SMTP id fn4mr1483619wib.1.1332968674183; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 14:04:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.3] ([79.97.74.113]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k6sm60943618wie.9.2012.03.28.14.04.33 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 28 Mar 2012 14:04:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4F737CE0.8050501@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 22:04:32 +0100 From: Sergey Beryozkin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110617 Thunderbird/3.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: CXF Dev CC: Benson Margulies Subject: Should be JSONP interceptors moved to rt-rs-security-cors Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Benson, all, I was wondering if it would make sense to move the JSONP interceptors to the CORS module. They are in rt-rs-extension-providers (on the trunk) right now, and seem a bit out place there, I'm reading CORS is a modern alternative to JSONP: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cross-origin_resource_sharing#CORS_relationship_to_JSONP thus may be grouping the interceptors dealing with supporting the cross origin resource sharing pattern (CORS the spec related, JSONP, etc) would do well, we of course can do it later too Cheers, Sergey -- Sergey Beryozkin Talend Community Coders http://coders.talend.com/ Blog: http://sberyozkin.blogspot.com