Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cxf-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cxf-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 557219F34 for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 10:46:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 92287 invoked by uid 500); 22 Dec 2011 10:46:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cxf-dev-archive@cxf.apache.org Received: (qmail 92173 invoked by uid 500); 22 Dec 2011 10:46:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cxf.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cxf.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cxf.apache.org Received: (qmail 92158 invoked by uid 99); 22 Dec 2011 10:46:44 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 10:46:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of sberyozkin@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.49 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.49] (HELO mail-ww0-f49.google.com) (74.125.82.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 10:46:38 +0000 Received: by wgbdt11 with SMTP id dt11so14153834wgb.6 for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 02:46:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=tH1D7j2dLGKugqKki1opMiw9IUDd7DCPlyhXlk6S2cU=; b=lcTgYs8rQOJqnGxE80W46Xp/3gIvr2IWGuDn+a/sevF8klha7x2Pvp+5t6h46vZp4j Je+H5wk5itRkLp/SSPgcauH0Ycrqw7exKDPkfXQD8qyLqQQLBeOusp6K0a4jbw/T660H B72i8bgKfqFP1itMHELiVCaqwcuLBWCks6dfo= Received: by 10.216.54.212 with SMTP id i62mr11305812wec.22.1324550777035; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 02:46:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.2.3] ([89.100.140.219]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id eg7sm21382354wib.8.2011.12.22.02.46.16 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 22 Dec 2011 02:46:16 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4EF30A77.4090504@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 10:46:15 +0000 From: Sergey Beryozkin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110617 Thunderbird/3.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: CXF Dev , "users@cxf.apache.org" Subject: Preparing for DOSGi RI 1.3 release Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi All, Dan, myself and David talked about the possibility of releasing DOSGi RI 1.3 based on Apache CXF. There are few reasons why we thought it was a good idea to pursue it. We are seeing a number of users periodically asking DOSGI-related questions and it's been unfortunate that some basic bugs have stopped users from experimenting with DOSGi and proceeding with the POC deployments and such though we believe a number of users have actually successfully deployed DOSGI RI in their projects without major problems or by fixing bugs locally and submitting patched back to the DOSGi RI project. So helping the community with fixing as many bugs as realistically possible in the short term and releasing DOSGi RI 1.3 is important. DOSGi RI has CXF JAX-WS and JAX-RS frontends operating on the OSGI Service registrations and look-ups and hence we hope that it can open up more interesting options for users to deploy web services in OSGi and therefore stress CXF from a different direction. I've spent few days on closing the JIRAs reported against DOSGi 1.1 and 1.2 due to DOSGI 1.3-SNAPSHOT has had its dependencies changed a lot (thanks to a major patch from Ancoron Luciferis), with CXF 2.5.1 supporting it now. I've also resolved a lot of JIRAs containing patches or hints on some basic modifications needed to get the issues fixed. Two modules have been removed, a zookeeper bundle wrapper and the local OSGI RemoteAdminService code which is now available in Central. Here is a complete list: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&mode=hide&jqlQuery=project+%3D+DOSGI+AND+resolutiondate+%3E%3D-1w+ORDER+BY+updated+DESC Here is the list of outstanding issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&mode=hide&jqlQuery=project+%3D+DOSGI+AND+resolutiondate+%3E%3D-1w+ORDER+BY+updated+DESC IMHO we are nearly good to go with the 1.3 release. What I'd like to do is to ask users who are interested in working or experimenting with DOSGi to give 1.3-SNAPSHOT a test on the latest Felix or Equinox distributions as well as check the list of outstanding issues and may be submit a couple of more patches. Personally I'd get a pint to anyone who will figure out how to fix https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DOSGI-18 :-) (that works in a single bundle case), though in case of JAX-RS the consumers can be the browsers. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DOSGI-106 also seems important enough, though HttpService can be used just fine with multi-bundle distros. So please give it a test, consider fixing a couple of more issues and we will be ready to proceed with the release early next year Thanks, Sergey -- Sergey Beryozkin Talend Community Coders http://coders.talend.com/ Blog: http://sberyozkin.blogspot.com