cxf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Aki Yoshida <elak...@googlemail.com>
Subject Re: svn commit: r1213179 - in /cxf/trunk/rt/ws/rm/src/main: java/org/apache/cxf/ws/rm/blueprint/ resources/schemas/configuration/ resources/schemas/configuration/blueprint/
Date Mon, 12 Dec 2011 13:49:51 GMT
Hi Dan,
okay. you are right. I just removed the bp reference but forgot the
same problem can happen in the other end as well.  i will remove the
spring schema reference too.
thanks.
regards, aki


2011/12/12 Daniel Kulp <dkulp@apache.org>:
> On Monday, December 12, 2011 9:43:37 AM ay@apache.org wrote:
>>             xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
>>             xmlns:wsrmp="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2005/02/rm/policy"
>> -           xmlns:beans="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans"
>> +           xmlns:s-beans="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans"
>> +           xmlns:bp-beans="http://www.osgi.org/xmlns/blueprint/v1.0.0"
>>             xmlns:cxf-beans="http://cxf.apache.org/configuration/beans"
>>             elementFormDefault="qualified"
>>             attributeFormDefault="unqualified">
>
> As you already discovered, this is not where we need to go with this.   The
> schemas need to NOT import blueprint or spring schemas in order to be usable
> by both.
>
> Ideally, the blueprint stuff is usable without Spring installed and Spring
> stuff is usable without blueprint.   Thus, the schemas, if they are shared,
> really need to not import either.  :-(
>
> --
> Daniel Kulp
> dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com

Mime
View raw message