Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cxf-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cxf-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4083E90B6 for ; Sat, 15 Oct 2011 05:59:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 16471 invoked by uid 500); 15 Oct 2011 05:59:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cxf-dev-archive@cxf.apache.org Received: (qmail 16347 invoked by uid 500); 15 Oct 2011 05:59:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cxf.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cxf.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cxf.apache.org Received: (qmail 16321 invoked by uid 99); 15 Oct 2011 05:59:03 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 15 Oct 2011 05:59:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of seijoed@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.169 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.169] (HELO mail-iy0-f169.google.com) (209.85.210.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 15 Oct 2011 05:58:55 +0000 Received: by iagf6 with SMTP id f6so2447159iag.0 for ; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 22:58:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id :to:mime-version:x-mailer; bh=pILo3bfeaS3x0GQ6fYeTWggGTNk/0NOCKwrlryG+zwM=; b=gfeLeTYAKo85ZhzOQD2mbR1DhHJMUfGv2qZfiGgQd6yPYcc2y2bMhxCwdV3FyOEU1J cWYtdvAOlFtvJkAT4tMOLPNpaleYnWm6KLZd7xJ5NTX8GafYWJ/BEVYaAf2BvDrdX9F2 l349hfbods17JbL18ypmnYEWwRpGGKrzyTpFs= Received: by 10.231.5.102 with SMTP id 38mr950359ibu.98.1318658314502; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 22:58:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.15.7] (70-59-32-208.hlrn.qwest.net. [70.59.32.208]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p16sm14899945ibk.6.2011.10.14.22.58.32 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 14 Oct 2011 22:58:33 -0700 (PDT) From: Johan Edstrom Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Features Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 23:58:26 -0600 Message-Id: <74259838-5622-4AB1-ABC8-58258D944BBC@gmail.com> To: dev@karaf.apache.org, dev@camel.apache.org, dev@cxf.apache.org, dev@servicemix.apache.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1244.3) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1244.3) Hey,=20 Just poking around in the features, and yes I cross post this -=20 I know there has been work going on with regards to creating a sane = default set of features but currently the CXF features in 2.4.2 (I think it was) uses spring = 3.0.6, the karaf features 3.0.5 and the camel features actually copy in cxf with a similar version but = the older neethi. If we want these features in a consistent state, should we have a master = reference? I know this will impact development and agility, but it sure as heck = would improve stability=20 if we had a solid inheritance chain? I know we also have a bunch of different features in the SMX area, would = a new features project help? Just asking=85 Cheers!