cxf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Freeman Fang <freeman.f...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Remove the CXF MTOSI examples?
Date Thu, 22 Sep 2011 13:12:04 GMT
Hi Glen,

That's not my company concern,  just my personal point of view :-)
Okay, ensure we still have those MTOSI example in SVN should be enough.

Freeman
On 2011-9-22, at 下午8:31, Glen Mazza wrote:

> No, if we're keeping it in the source distribution we should keep it  
> in both.
> This example is either Good or Not Good, and, on that basis, it  
> should be
> either included with both or excluded with both.  (I understand your  
> company
> has a customer requirement to Mavenize all unmavenized binary  
> distribution
> samples that would be solved by having MTOSI only in the source
> distribution, but I have a larger concern of removing unused examples,
> period--one that would also take care of your concern :)  Of course,  
> it
> would always be available in the SVN archives for anybody still  
> interested
> in it.
>
> In my view, again, none of us here have sufficient knowledge about  
> MTOSI to
> be able to authoritatively document it, so it is irresponsible for  
> us to
> keep an example showing how to use it--authoritative documentation  
> can be
> the role only of the MTOSI team.  ("Professionally maintaining a MTOSI
> sample in our distribution" is probably an oxymoron.)  Indeed, for  
> any third
> party web service X, how to use X can only be defined on X.com.  Any
> third-party web service (or in this case, standard) too inactive or
> uninterested to document how their own stuff works, that's a warning  
> signal
> that we should be steering clear of it rather than trying to  
> document it for
> them and include examples for it.
>
> Glen
>
>
>
> Freeman-2 wrote:
>>
>> +1 to exclude it from binary kit, just keep them in svn and src kit.
>>
>> Freeman
>> On 2011-9-22, at 上午1:28, Glen Mazza wrote:
>>
>>> Nuking appears appropriate.  If MTOSI's WSDL's are well designed, no
>>> special
>>> example for it would be needed (either our already existing Java-
>>> first or
>>> WSDL-first samples would suffice.)  If they're not and need special
>>> tweaks,
>>> it's the responsibility of the MTOSI team (assuming such a team
>>> exists) to
>>> document on their own website how to get their non-standard WSDLs to
>>> work
>>> with JAX-WS implementations, not vice-versa.
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> View this message in context:
>>> http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/Remove-the-CXF-MTOSI-examples-tp4826982p4827176.html
>>> Sent from the cxf-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------
>> Freeman Fang
>>
>> FuseSource
>> Email:ffang@fusesource.com
>> Web: fusesource.com
>> Twitter: freemanfang
>> Blog: http://freemanfang.blogspot.com
>>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/Remove-the-CXF-MTOSI-examples-tp4826982p4829980.html
> Sent from the cxf-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

---------------------------------------------
Freeman Fang

FuseSource
Email:ffang@fusesource.com
Web: fusesource.com
Twitter: freemanfang
Blog: http://freemanfang.blogspot.com










Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message