Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cxf.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@cxf.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of sberyozkin@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.214.41 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <2046063.6CoaqjzM8h@dilbert.dankulp.com>
References: 
 <CALhtWkfCbAJ6HLgtPW-T+aO-TaiBRf8tma=YJGMHFbXo8GqFcw@mail.gmail.com>
	<2046063.6CoaqjzM8h@dilbert.dankulp.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 07:55:45 +0100
Message-ID: 
 <CAOtGrG+idq=669rzT_QkUiZi2X+uYAx+v3w+C-_WGLxO=5HQFg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Proxies as abstract classes?
From: Sergey Beryozkin <sberyozkin@gmail.com>
To: dev@cxf.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

HI

On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 9:45 PM, Daniel Kulp <dkulp@apache.org> wrote:
> On Monday, August 15, 2011 7:31:37 AM Benson Margulies wrote:
>> Has anyone ever considered the utility or practicality of generating a
>> concrete subclass of an abstract class as a proxy? All the standards
>> we conform to are relentless about interfaces, aren't they?
>
> Using ASM or cglib to do this really shouldn't be too hard if it's someth=
ing
> you really wanted to tackle. =A0:-) =A0 =A0The ClientProxyFactory stuff w=
ould need
> to be updated to call cls.isInterface() and do something a bit smarter if=
 it's
> not. =A0 Not really sure what the demand for something like that would be
> though.
>
ProxyHelper in common utils can help in case of cglib being used.
This feature can be of interest for creating JAX-RS proxies because
JAX-RS root resources
are often not implementing any interfaces at all, this is why I'm
finding it useful when writing tests :-)

Cheers, Sergey

> --
> Daniel Kulp
> dkulp@apache.org
> http://dankulp.com/blog
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>


--=20
Sergey Beryozkin

http://sberyozkin.blogspot.com
Talend - http://www.talend.com