Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cxf-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cxf-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1B61E6316 for ; Fri, 8 Jul 2011 12:41:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 98897 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2011 12:41:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cxf-dev-archive@cxf.apache.org Received: (qmail 98830 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2011 12:41:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cxf.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cxf.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cxf.apache.org Received: (qmail 98821 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jul 2011 12:41:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Jul 2011 12:41:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,URI_HEX X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of asoldano@redhat.com designates 209.132.183.28 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.132.183.28] (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Jul 2011 12:41:06 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p68Cejmp008313 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 8 Jul 2011 08:40:46 -0400 Received: from [10.36.4.159] (vpn1-4-159.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.4.159]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p68CeicJ014907 for ; Fri, 8 Jul 2011 08:40:45 -0400 Message-ID: <4E16FACC.4000406@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2011 14:40:44 +0200 From: Alessio Soldano User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110307 Fedora/3.1.9-0.38.b3pre.fc13 Thunderbird/3.1.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cxf.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Support WS-Notification in CXF References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.67 on 10.5.11.11 Hi, I'm not sure of the exact requirements in ServiceMix, in any case I suggest evaluating the WS-Eventing spec from WS-ResourceAccess http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/ which is at CR level atm and is being finalized *really* soon. Cheers Alessio On 07/08/2011 11:36 AM, Freeman Fang wrote: > Hi Team, > > Recently we're discussing on Servicemix Dev mailling list about redesign > ws-notification component, previously it was designed as JBI > ServiceEngine and need work together with BindingComponet(like > servicemix-cxf-bc or servicmeix-http) over JBI bus, we currently want to > make it working without any JBI stuff and we believe this is more > natural as ws-notification[2] actually is wsdl based and we think move > the ws-notification into CXF is more reasonable. > > Though no concrete idea now, my gut feeling is that we can leverage our > jms transport to do this. > > How about we support WS-Notification in CXF? Any feedback is appreciated. > > [1]http://servicemix.396122.n5.nabble.com/DiSCUSS-WS-Notification-td4563871.html > > [2]http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=wsn > > Best Regards > Freeman > --------------------------------------------- > Freeman Fang > > FuseSource > Email:ffang@fusesource.com > Web: fusesource.com > Twitter: freemanfang > Blog: http://freemanfang.blogspot.com > > > > > > > > > > -- Alessio Soldano Web Service Lead, JBoss