cxf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Willem Jiang <willem.ji...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Remove JBI stuff in 2.5
Date Mon, 13 Jun 2011 12:47:52 GMT
+1 for it.

BTW,
Camel-CXF doesn't have the direct dependency of JBI transport.

On 6/13/11 7:15 PM, Freeman Fang wrote:
> +1
>
> I'll remove the JBI stuff from CXF and add these in Servicemix component.
>
> Freeman
> On 2011-6-10, at 下午8:57, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
>>
>> I want to start a discussion about removing the JBI related modules on
>> trunk.
>> There is the JBI binding, JBI transport, and the JBI integration
>> module that,
>> IMO, could be removed.
>>
>> Basically, if you are using CXF in JBI, you are most likely using the CXF
>> BC/SE components from ServiceMix, not the stuff we provide directly.
>> Really,
>> I think the only consumers of this stuff are the BC/SE. Thus, I'd propose
>> this code gets removed from CXF and whatever is needed by the BC/SE
>> just gets
>> pushed into those components in SMX. Keep all the JBI related stuff
>> there.
>>
>> Thoughts? Opinions?
>>
>> --
>> Daniel Kulp
>> dkulp@apache.org
>> http://dankulp.com/blog
>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------
> Freeman Fang
>
> FuseSource
> Email:ffang@fusesource.com
> Web: fusesource.com
> Twitter: freemanfang
> Blog: http://freemanfang.blogspot.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


-- 
Willem
----------------------------------
FuseSource
Web: http://www.fusesource.com
Blog:    http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (English)
          http://jnn.javaeye.com (Chinese)
Twitter: willemjiang
Weibo: willemjiang

Mime
View raw message