Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cxf-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 6185 invoked from network); 14 Apr 2011 05:39:28 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Apr 2011 05:39:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 4032 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2011 05:39:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cxf-dev-archive@cxf.apache.org Received: (qmail 3986 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2011 05:39:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cxf.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cxf.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cxf.apache.org Received: (qmail 3976 invoked by uid 99); 14 Apr 2011 05:39:25 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 05:39:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_NEUTRAL,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL,URI_HEX X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: 216.139.236.26 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of sagara.gunathunga@gmail.com) Received: from [216.139.236.26] (HELO sam.nabble.com) (216.139.236.26) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 05:39:18 +0000 Received: from [192.168.236.26] (helo=sam.nabble.com) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QAFGb-0005Gr-Ta for dev@cxf.apache.org; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 22:38:57 -0700 Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 22:38:57 -0700 (PDT) From: sagara To: dev@cxf.apache.org Message-ID: <1302759537890-4302240.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <201104121117.22787.dkulp@apache.org> References: <201104121117.22787.dkulp@apache.org> Subject: Re: GSoC. CXF-48 / WSDL 2.0 Support MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Pointing out a different aspect, did you identify any utility to generate WSDL 2.0 model ? Apache Woden [1] can be a good candidate. But better to aware with incompatibilities at the beginning , AFAIK Woden and CXF use incompatible versions of XMLSchema also Woden use Commons logging API while CXF use Java Util logging and SLF4J. [1] - http://ws.apache.org/woden/ -- View this message in context: http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/GSoC-CXF-48-WSDL-2-0-Support-tp4296871p4302240.html Sent from the cxf-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.