cxf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Benson Margulies <bimargul...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: GSoC. CXF-48 / WSDL 2.0 Support
Date Fri, 15 Apr 2011 01:01:46 GMT
In my opinion, making the schema system pluggable would be pretty
painful. I wonder if we could just push woden to 2.0? Or does that run
afoul of the state of Axis?

If only we were using OSGi for all of this (....)

On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 8:57 PM, Daniel Kulp <dkulp@apache.org> wrote:
> On Thursday 14 April 2011 1:38:57 AM sagara wrote:
>> Pointing out a different aspect, did you identify any utility to generate
>> WSDL 2.0 model ? Apache Woden [1] can be a good candidate.
>
> Honestly, Apache Woden is the only one I'm really familliar with at all.
> There is EasyWSDL at OW2, but I've never really looked too in depth at it.
>
>
>> But better to aware with incompatibilities at the beginning , AFAIK Woden
>> and CXF use incompatible versions of XMLSchema also Woden use  Commons
>> logging  API while CXF use Java Util logging and SLF4J.
>
> The logging thing is relatively irrelvant.  Spring uses commons-logging as
> well so we do ship it.   That saif, shipping the SLF4J commons-logging api jar
> thing might be a good idea instead.
>
> The XmlSchema thing is the bigger concert.  We may need to submit patches
> there to make the schema system more  pluggable.   I can definitely help out
> there as well.
>
> Dan
>
>
>>
>> [1] - http://ws.apache.org/woden/
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/GSoC-CXF-48-WSDL-2-0-Support-tp4296871p430
>> 2240.html Sent from the cxf-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> --
> Daniel Kulp
> dkulp@apache.org
> http://dankulp.com/blog
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>

Mime
View raw message