Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cxf-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 72017 invoked from network); 7 Jan 2011 16:27:18 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Jan 2011 16:27:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 85429 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jan 2011 16:27:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cxf-dev-archive@cxf.apache.org Received: (qmail 85274 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jan 2011 16:27:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cxf.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cxf.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cxf.apache.org Received: (qmail 85265 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jan 2011 16:27:17 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 Jan 2011 16:27:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of bimargulies@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.41 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.41] (HELO mail-bw0-f41.google.com) (209.85.214.41) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 Jan 2011 16:27:10 +0000 Received: by bwz16 with SMTP id 16so20072360bwz.0 for ; Fri, 07 Jan 2011 08:26:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=EiAbxv2svusO/KK3XD2JIYkNZIIKy2vj/Nkc2qb0XNs=; b=J3W+NkMMXPVlVZfaue/3zy7STGJdH8tHlEZngkLPiaC337GHBdYi4eixzZ9PmRa4FO nOtwHVUMyXCIywbWxVhYJQjqrdePQkNEbAaZbFEWfNnRfsBwP+Bj4W4ZHzMYERzkQsIa NS7kIOlEErl5RqZCabefc7akk6Js9HJTtU0DI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=T/TrIWZL3c8Ipx3IDgZOGxgxfHwEfPw8AzDBYDi+UR7CjSI0Tthqt48lc9BTn5lc1g BdCPpI83HAe3YqI13proHLw3Ae2VAUp3CBhYjbv56jRt1OdvQ9wF36BTeh7Q+2eaYG1S +hHUsmz3E/1pRxoXwz5cAi8wNdPPuzMMKyIyE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.70.142 with SMTP id d14mr3114997bkj.13.1294417610090; Fri, 07 Jan 2011 08:26:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.45.66 with HTTP; Fri, 7 Jan 2011 08:26:50 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <201101071121.08901.dkulp@apache.org> References: <201101071121.08901.dkulp@apache.org> Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 11:26:50 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Thinking about doing 2.3.2 soon.... From: Benson Margulies To: dev@cxf.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I want to at least fix the lack of MSV mention in WHICH_JARS, even if I can't explain why some people who don't have maven get noisy explosions without msv. On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 11:21 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > I just noticed in JIRA that we've already resolved 53 issues for 2.3.2. > Thus, I'm kind of leaning toward doing a 2.3.2 pretty soon. =C2=A0 Howeve= r, I think > we need a release of WSS4J first to fix a couple of the issues. =C2=A0I t= hink there > are still one or two minor things he'd like to get in for that. > > Thus, if he can get WSS4J released sometime next week, I think we could b= uild > 2.3.2 either late next week (14th) or early the following week. > > Thoughts? > > -- > Daniel Kulp > dkulp@apache.org > http://dankulp.com/blog >