Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cxf-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 38026 invoked from network); 24 Jan 2011 19:07:10 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Jan 2011 19:07:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 33389 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jan 2011 19:07:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cxf-dev-archive@cxf.apache.org Received: (qmail 33316 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jan 2011 19:07:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cxf.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cxf.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cxf.apache.org Received: (qmail 33308 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jan 2011 19:07:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 19:07:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [64.85.173.253] (HELO server.dankulp.com) (64.85.173.253) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 19:07:03 +0000 Received: by server.dankulp.com (Postfix, from userid 5000) id 9C7C3187844; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 14:06:42 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on server.dankulp.com X-Spam-Level: X-Msg-File: /tmp/mailfilter-dev@cxf.apache.org.aqsfl63wsK Received: from dilbert.localnet (c-24-91-72-253.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [24.91.72.253]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by server.dankulp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 82743187840; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 14:06:41 -0500 (EST) From: Daniel Kulp To: dev@cxf.apache.org, =?iso-8859-1?q?C=E9sar_Couto?= Subject: Re: Do CXF developers use FindBugs? Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 14:06:47 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.37; KDE/4.5.5; x86_64; ; ) References: <4D3DCBFE.8030006@die-schneider.net> In-Reply-To: <4D3DCBFE.8030006@die-schneider.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <201101241406.47837.dkulp@apache.org> X-Old-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.9 required=3.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, SHORTCIRCUIT shortcircuit=ham autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1 On Monday 24 January 2011 1:59:10 pm Christian Schneider wrote: > Checkstyle and Findbugs run whenever you do a mvn install in cxf. > So yes we are using findbugs. The build even enforces that certain pmd > rules are followed. Actually, no. Checkstyle and PMD are run for every build. Findbugs is not. We've run= in=20 on a couple of modules, but the noise level was fairly high and configuring= =20 all the rules such was taking too much time so it was kind of dropped. =20 Dan > Christian >=20 > Am 24.01.2011 19:06, schrieb C=E9sar Couto: > > Dear developers, > >=20 > > I am a PhD student at UFMG, Brazil and as part of my research I am > > making a study about the relevance of the warnings reported by the > > FindBugs bug finding tool. > >=20 > > Since I am planning to use CFX as a subject system in my research, > > I would like to know if CFX's developers usually run FindBugs as > > part of the system development process. > >=20 > > Thanks in advance, > >=20 > > Cesar Couto =2D-=20 Daniel Kulp dkulp@apache.org http://dankulp.com/blog