cxf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Ma <mail2ji...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.3.2
Date Thu, 20 Jan 2011 13:11:29 GMT
Thanks Dan.  My fix  to CXF-3209 introduced these regression failures
. I've reverted these changes in 2.3.x branch . I'll look this issue
again and provide some better test for it .


On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Daniel Kulp <dkulp@apache.org> wrote:
>
> I want to give Jim a bit more time to investigate what is causing the
> failures.  I chatted with him a bit on IRC and I'm not exactly sure how the
> test is SUPPOSED to work at all so it's hard to say what is going on.
>
> THAT said, -1's on release votes are not a veto.  Thus, as release manager,
> it's my discretion as to how to handle the -1.   My gut feeling, right now,
> would be to release 2.3.2 "as is" as the standalone JAX-WS TCK does pass and
> thus all of OUR claims are OK.   Once we get a handle on the J2EE level
> things, we can quickly spin a 2.3.3.   I really have no issues with a "release
> often" approach.
>
> That said, I do want to give Jim a little more time to look into it.  Since
> there is still 20ish hours left on the vote, it's not something I'll commit to
> either way RIGHT NOW.   It may end being something JBoss can work around and
> we won't need to worry about it. (that has happened a couple times in the
> past)
>
> Dan
>
>
> On Wednesday 19 January 2011 10:59:03 pm Glen Mazza wrote:
>> I don't think a new vote is necessary, because as stated the vote covers
>> both portions.  So everyone has voted +1 and +1 up to Jim.
>>
>> To be valid, a veto must have a justifiable reason, and Jim certainly
>> does have one for CXF 2.3.2 but not CXF XJC 2.3.2, so the latter can
>> still proceed (if desirable).  I would very much like to get CXF XJC
>> 2.3.2 fixed so I don't have to keep taking out the JAXB 2.2 libraries
>> from my JDK when I try to make a build.  That said, I suspect Dan
>> wouldn't want to release one without the other, it's just that a second
>> vote isn't needed IMO.
>>
>> Glen
>>
>> On 19.01.2011 22:37, Willem Jiang wrote:
>> > Maybe we can consider to release XJC 2.3.2 as it doesn't relate to TCK
>> > failures. And we don't need to cut new version of XJC 2.3.2 again.
>> >
>> > Can we start a new vote for CXF XJC 2.3.2 ?
>> >
>> > Willem
>> >
>> > On 1/20/11 11:02 AM, Jim Ma wrote:
>> >> I have to vote -1 for this release.
>> >> The new changes in tagged CXF 2.3.2  introduced several JEE6 TCK
>> >> regression failures . I am looking for a quick fix for these failures.
>> >>
>> >> Jim
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 8:28 AM, Eric
>> >>
>> >> Johnson<emjohnson@fusesource.com>  wrote:
>> >>> +1
>> >>>
>> >>> On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 6:31 PM, Christian Schneider
>> >>>
>> >>> <chris@die-schneider.net>  wrote:
>> >>>> +1
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Christian
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Am 18.01.2011 05:26, schrieb Daniel Kulp:
>> >>>>> We've had a busy 8 weeks or so despite the holidays.   We've
>> >>>>> managed to
>> >>>>> fix over 75 JIRA issues since 2.3.1 which is quite remarkable
.
>> >>>>> This also
>> >>>>> fixes a bunch of OSGi related issues that are needed for
>> >>>>> Camel and ServiceMix.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Note:  this vote also includes a release of the cxf-xjc-utils
to
>> >>>>> fix a
>> >>>>> bunch of issues that were resolved there.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> List of issues:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=123159
>> >>>>> 21&styleName=Text&projectId=12310511&Create=Create
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> The Maven staging areas are at:
>> >>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecxf-041/
>> >>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecxf-042/
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> The distributions are in:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecxf-042/o
>> >>>>> rg/apache/cxf/apache-cxf/2.3.2/
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> This release is tagged at:
>> >>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf/tags/cxf-2.3.2
>> >>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf/xjc-utils/tags/xjc-utils-2.3.2/
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> The vote will be open for 72 hours.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Here is my +1.
>
> --
> Daniel Kulp
> dkulp@apache.org
> http://dankulp.com/blog
>

Mime
View raw message