Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cxf.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@cxf.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of sberyozkin@gmail.com designates
 209.85.214.41 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        b=j1c4fcG3c1RBIK4wDdEkbXNN/eI8X7rcRywdrWMlqDXyxMVfvt6Vct4FQZudBTW170
         Lzz4PrtIeXls+ObydIKOX4LmZ46beEM7QsaMHZsDWKynWY+ipc5T6DrcMoo0hZB9H+D+
         LpkgCandkxO07hUlJrGY0SRW3GW6bgayH/BxM=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2010 14:26:11 +0000
Message-ID: <AANLkTinGjzMy6qTspd5XEJiYExWKbbTLi2s=3oY2jZBk@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Two way requests can get ahead of oneway requests ?
From: Sergey Beryozkin <sberyozkin@gmail.com>
To: dev@cxf.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485f796e2a499e80496aa8d14

--001485f796e2a499e80496aa8d14
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hi

I've noticed, while working on my demo, that if a proxy executes two
operations, with the 1st one being a oneway operation, then sometimes the
server sees the 2nd operation being invoked first.

I can see why it is happening and obviously the server code should not make
any assumptions in this case, but can CXF at least make the best effort,
perhaps by increasing the priority of the server threads dealing with the
actual execution of oneway requests ?

Thoughts ?

Sergey

--001485f796e2a499e80496aa8d14--