Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cxf.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@cxf.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of sapakiy@googlemail.com
 designates 209.85.160.169 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=dlVO970bSfENEGVuzUoUgsDJmurM3QOXdYYOyZnnhflU/ENAcOv1WCzACTgFeMk/+h
         Rzv3EMgIRRCGfyCymhgsxR5lXeeTv2Pk3mIPgE2ZtuEIoGTjFYdy4fwbiq/dJe1MJEIz
         zaNEWAGSYzqtf5rHD7yx8LfWgg2Ff8WYTorVc=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <201011151421.56982.dkulp@apache.org>
References: 
 <C44E58389D52844CB0CB648B1BC15C73011193E2CB40@VA3DIAXVS121.RED001.local>
	<201011151146.08177.dkulp@apache.org>
	<C44E58389D52844CB0CB648B1BC15C73011193E2CBCA@VA3DIAXVS121.RED001.local>
	<201011151421.56982.dkulp@apache.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 14:58:38 +0100
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=wzoYD8chB=j1X6Szfms8Gf1yTUrHk_s9XwDM-@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Status of WS-RM
From: Aki Yoshida <sapakiy@googlemail.com>
To: dev@cxf.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 8:21 PM, Daniel Kulp <dkulp@apache.org> wrote:
> On Monday 15 November 2010 12:05:56 pm Scott Came wrote:
>> Thanks, Daniel.
>> What about the potential to leverage Sandesha or the implementation in
>> Metro? =A0My research has indicated that some time ago there was discuss=
ion
>> about trying to create a reusable RM library that could do the job (with
>> adaptation) across the various open source implementations of WS-*. =A0W=
hile
>> it seems that never went anywhere (probably with good reason) should I
>> have any hope of reusing significant chunks of code from either of those
>> efforts?
>
> Well, for Sandesha, I haven't looked at the code there at all so I don't =
know
> how reasonable it is to reuse chunks of it. =A0 For WS-SecPol, I did use =
the
> Rampart code as a base, but it pretty much ended up as a complete re-writ=
e by
> the time I was done with it. =A0 Sandesha might be in the same ball park.

It would be nice to share some part of the implementation to save the
development and maintenance cost.
But I also have a feeling that using Sandesha won't be a shorter path
to support WS-RM 1.1 in CXF.

I am looking into some other issues of the current 1.0 implementation
but I am also interested in this question of going for 1.1.

Regards, Aki