Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-9784-apmail-cxf-dev-archive=cxf.apache.org@cxf.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-cxf-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 56741 invoked from network); 12 Oct 2010 21:59:55 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3)
  by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 12 Oct 2010 21:59:55 -0000
Received: (qmail 75784 invoked by uid 500); 12 Oct 2010 21:59:55 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-cxf-dev-archive@cxf.apache.org
Received: (qmail 75743 invoked by uid 500); 12 Oct 2010 21:59:55 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cxf.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@cxf.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@cxf.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@cxf.apache.org>
List-Id: <dev.cxf.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@cxf.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cxf.apache.org
Received: (qmail 75735 invoked by uid 99); 12 Oct 2010 21:59:55 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 21:59:55 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0
	tests=SPF_NEUTRAL
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Received: from [64.85.173.253] (HELO server.dankulp.com) (64.85.173.253)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 21:59:48 +0000
Received: by server.dankulp.com (Postfix, from userid 5000)
	id 7C03F186F0F; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 17:59:28 -0400 (EDT)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on server.dankulp.com
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Msg-File: /tmp/mailfilter-dev@cxf.apache.org.CWwtgZAp4m
Received: from dilbert.dankulp.com (c-24-91-72-253.hsd1.ma.comcast.net
 [24.91.72.253])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by server.dankulp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C3955186F0D;
	Tue, 12 Oct 2010 17:59:25 -0400 (EDT)
From: Daniel Kulp <dkulp@apache.org>
To: dev@cxf.apache.org
Subject: Re: Schema oddity
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 17:57:43 -0400
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.35; KDE/4.5.2; x86_64; ; )
Cc: Benson Margulies <bimargulies@gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTin65P6sFmVvQa27xBxfSkmOa2EJeMu11Sp7dAbw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTin65P6sFmVvQa27xBxfSkmOa2EJeMu11Sp7dAbw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201010121757.43937.dkulp@apache.org>
X-Old-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=3.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
	shortcircuit=no autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1

On Tuesday 12 October 2010 5:49:31 pm Benson Margulies wrote:
> One of our test schemas says:
> 
> 
>  <element name="inHeader">
>                                 <complexType>
>                                         <sequence>
>                                                 <element name=""
> type="xsd:string"/>
>                                         </sequence>
>                                 </complexType>
>                         </element>
> 
> 
> Is a null name really a reasonable thing in a sequence? As I read the
> spec, name="" is never reasonable. The spec demands an NCName for
> name, and either name or ref must be present.

Yea.  I don't think that would be valid.  Now, the question is, is the test 
testing what happens with an invalid schema?    I suppose that's too much to 
ask for.  :-)

-- 
Daniel Kulp
dkulp@apache.org
http://dankulp.com/blog