Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cxf-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 61644 invoked from network); 23 Sep 2010 14:15:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Sep 2010 14:15:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 25071 invoked by uid 500); 23 Sep 2010 14:15:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cxf-dev-archive@cxf.apache.org Received: (qmail 24896 invoked by uid 500); 23 Sep 2010 14:15:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cxf.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cxf.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cxf.apache.org Received: (qmail 24888 invoked by uid 99); 23 Sep 2010 14:15:24 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 14:15:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [64.85.173.253] (HELO server.dankulp.com) (64.85.173.253) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 14:15:01 +0000 Received: by server.dankulp.com (Postfix, from userid 5000) id 4E951186DAD; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 10:14:41 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on server.dankulp.com X-Spam-Level: X-Msg-File: /tmp/mailfilter-dev@cxf.apache.org.HBqkE1EiN2 Received: from dilbert.dankulp.com (c-24-91-72-253.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [24.91.72.253]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by server.dankulp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 55225186D83; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 10:14:39 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Kulp To: dev@cxf.apache.org Subject: Re: Next JMS sample Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 10:12:56 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.35; KDE/4.5.1; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Benson Margulies References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201009231012.56490.dkulp@apache.org> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Old-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=3.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 shortcircuit=no autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 On Monday 20 September 2010 8:22:07 pm Benson Margulies wrote: > I'm not sure what, if anything, to do with pubsub. It's all using the > wsdl config, right? Is there anything wrong? There's nothing WRONG. It's a perfectly fine example. It's just showing how to use the older WSDL config and not the newer SOAP/JMS spec stuff. I'm actually OK with that. I definitely don't see us dropping support for those wsdl extensor things. > Why the bogus endpoint > address in the Endpoint call in the server? I think JAX-WS requires some sort of address to the endpoint.publish call so we historically just stick in "jms://" in there to make JAX-WS happy. :-) If you try something like enpoint.publish(null), you have to cast the null to resolve the overloaded publish. Nothing major. -- Daniel Kulp dkulp@apache.org http://dankulp.com/blog