cxf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Benson Margulies <bimargul...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: CXF 2.3 packaging......
Date Fri, 17 Sep 2010 16:28:42 GMT
I'm getting there. You are right. cxf-wstx-msv-validation is indeed
plain schema validation for Aegis.

The other one, with xerces in its name, is the 'check for generating
bogus schema'.


On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Daniel Kulp <dkulp@apache.org> wrote:
> On Friday 17 September 2010 12:21:48 pm Benson Margulies wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 12:15 PM, Daniel Kulp <dkulp@apache.org> wrote:
>> > On Friday 17 September 2010 12:12:28 pm Benson Margulies wrote:
>> >> THe first two are live insofar as they deliver a real feature:
>> >> validation of the XSD that we produce in Aegis.
>> >>
>> >> The primary reason to have this feature is to catch our own mistakes:
>> >> if Aegis is coded right, it should never produce an invalid XSD.
>> >
>> > Isn't the cxf-wstx-msv-validation one also used to provide incoming
>> > schema validation for Aegis to validate the incoming message against the
>> > (hopefully valid) schema that Aegis produced?   Basically, the
>> > implementation of "schema- validation"/"true" for Aegis?
>>
>> I don't remember. I'd better go look.
>
> Part of the reason I really want to get 2.3 out.   I don't remember a lot of
> it either.  :-(
>
> Dan
>
>
>> Honestly, I think that 'schema
>> validation' as we usually understand it can be done with JAXP API and
>> so didn't need this extra level of Xerces-only wrapping.
>>
>> > If so, that's definitely valuable and something to list in the new
>> > features and make sure it's included.
>> >
>> > Dan
>> >
>> >> On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Daniel Kulp <dkulp@apache.org> wrote:
>> >> > There are some jars and such on trunk that we are building and using
>> >> > during testing and such that are not part of the cxf-bundle or even
>> >> > packaged in the distribution at all:
>> >> >
>> >> > cxf-wstx-msv-validation
>> >> > xerces-xsd-validation
>> >> > cxf-rt-databinding-sdo
>> >> > cxf-rt-management-web
>> >> >
>> >> > and all the transient deps of the above.....
>> >> >
>> >> > So, which of the above should be added to the bundle?  We could add
>> >> > all of them to the bundle and just mark all their deps
>> >> > optional/provided.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Also, are there things in the bundle that could/should be pulled out?
>> >> > I'm actually thinking of creating a separate "cxf-tools" and moving
>> >> > the command line tooling things into there.  Thus, the bundle would
>> >> > be more just the runtime parts.   Thoughts?
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Another quick question:  are there docs for the validation things
>> >> > above or the management-web?   There isn't for SDO so I'll add that
>> >> > to my todo as well.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > Daniel Kulp
>> >> > dkulp@apache.org
>> >> > http://dankulp.com/blog
>> >
>> > --
>> > Daniel Kulp
>> > dkulp@apache.org
>> > http://dankulp.com/blog
>
> --
> Daniel Kulp
> dkulp@apache.org
> http://dankulp.com/blog
>

Mime
View raw message