cxf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Willem Jiang <willem.ji...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Releasing 2.3
Date Mon, 20 Sep 2010 01:34:19 GMT
On 9/20/10 9:23 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Willem,
>
> If you've been reading the email, you'll see that I've hit a snag in
> using the JAX-WS API to create a client proxy over JMS in the
> java_first_jms sample. If you'd care to dive in and see if you can fix
> the sample (or some bug in the underlying code) I'd be grateful.
>
> --benson
>
>
Sure, I'm work on it now :)

Willem

>
>>> 3) (optional) Update the jms sample to use jms spec.  (benson, not high
>>> priority though)  Acutally, would be good to update the other jms samples
>>> as
>>> well.
>>
>> I can also give my hands on this example.
>>
>> Willem
>>>
>>> 4) (optional) Try and get new releases of WSS4J and XmlSchema.  WSS4J
>>> would be
>>> nice as it would allow fixing a couple other JIRA issues.   I'll talk to
>>> Colm
>>> about WSS4J.
>>>
>>> 5) Packaging issues with cxf-bundle.  I'll start a separate thread for
>>> this,
>>> but the quick summary is there are things that aren't in cxf-bundle (like
>>> sdo
>>> databinding, and some of the validation jars and such).   There are also
>>> things that are in the bundle that probably could not be (like all the
>>> tools
>>> could go into a separate cxf-tools bundle to reduce the size of the rt
>>> bundle).  Anyway, separate thread.
>>>
>>> 6) JIRA issues - like normal, I plan to go through JIRA and see if there
>>> are
>>> any "easy fixes" that can be done quickly or have patches that could be
>>> reviewed.
>>>
>>>
>>> Anything else?
>>>
>>> Looking at it, would people feel OK trying to target the week of Oct 4th
>>> as
>>> the release for 2.3?    The packaging issues are the main thing that need
>>> to
>>> be finalized.   Hopefully not too major.
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>>>
>>
>>
>


Mime
View raw message