cxf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sergey Beryozkin <sberyoz...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: JMS transport strongly depends on Spring
Date Wed, 04 Aug 2010 17:53:09 GMT
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 6:30 PM, Glen Mazza <glen.mazza@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> Sergey Beryozkin-5 wrote:
> >
> > This causes problems when doing non-Spring CXF deployments.
> > Generally, we should really try to keep the Spring related code in
> .spring
> > subpackages as it will make it simpler for CXF be integrated with other
> > similar frameworks or deployed in containers providing the optional
> Spring
> > support only.
> >
>
> I wonder if we could just rename Spring to Banana and use Banana's JARs
> instead.  Such a wrapping would allow us to use Spring to our heart's
> content while at the same time truthfully saying we're 100% Spring-free.
> (Or would we then need to worry about supporting non-Banana deployments?
>  :)
>
>
Don't really get it... Or is it the case of someone missing the point that
some users of CXF just do not want to use Spring ?


> --
> View this message in context:
> http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/JMS-transport-strongly-depends-on-Spring-tp2262704p2264402.html
> Sent from the cxf-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message