cxf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Glen Mazza <glen.ma...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: JMS transport strongly depends on Spring
Date Wed, 04 Aug 2010 17:30:12 GMT


Sergey Beryozkin-5 wrote:
> 
> This causes problems when doing non-Spring CXF deployments.
> Generally, we should really try to keep the Spring related code in .spring
> subpackages as it will make it simpler for CXF be integrated with other
> similar frameworks or deployed in containers providing the optional Spring
> support only.
> 

I wonder if we could just rename Spring to Banana and use Banana's JARs
instead.  Such a wrapping would allow us to use Spring to our heart's
content while at the same time truthfully saying we're 100% Spring-free. 
(Or would we then need to worry about supporting non-Banana deployments?  :)

-- 
View this message in context: http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/JMS-transport-strongly-depends-on-Spring-tp2262704p2264402.html
Sent from the cxf-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Mime
View raw message