cxf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Benson Margulies <bimargul...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: jetty 7: CXF-2898
Date Fri, 16 Jul 2010 01:53:28 GMT
The continuation code is very different. I attached a first pass
patch. It does not pass unit tests because I am completely flummoxed
by mock, and I may not understand what's going on with the
continuations.

On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 9:13 PM, Willem Jiang <willem.jiang@gmail.com> wrote:
> Daniel Kulp wrote:
>>
>> On Thursday 15 July 2010 2:33:26 pm Benson Margulies wrote:
>>>
>>> The first part of the JIRA I filed above is easy: make a new project that
>>> depends on jetty 7 instead of 6.
>>>
>>> I'm somewhat rusty after that. A profile in systests to use it? Where is
>>> the default transport established (which I don't propose to change) but
>>> what else is called for?
>>
>> Well, I guess there is a question of whether is makes sense to make 2.3
>> use Jetty 7 and have 2.2 remain at 6.    I would actually be OK with that.
>> How much would the CODE change?   Is it just the dependencies or does it
>> require a lot of code changes as well?
>>
> Jetty 7 changed its package name to start with org.eclipse, so the code
> could be changed a bit.
>
> Willem
>

Mime
View raw message