cxf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>
Subject Re: To spring 3 or not to spring 3
Date Fri, 16 Jul 2010 21:44:15 GMT
On Friday 16 July 2010 5:35:37 pm Benson Margulies wrote:
> Is anyone out there willing to admit that they have a good
> understanding of either the existing jetty continuation code, the
> mock-based tests, or both?

Yea. I was planning on looking at it today, but kind of ran out of time doing 
other things.   :-(

I really hate mocks.


Dan


> 
> On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 5:14 PM, Daniel Kulp <dkulp@apache.org> wrote:
> > Since we are getting close to having 2.3 ready to release, I'm kind of
> > looking at the various deps to see if there are updates we should grab
> > or not. Things like woodstox and abdera and such are pretty much
> > no-brainers.
> > 
> > The two main contention points are:
> > 1) Jetty from 6 to 7- Benson has started investigating this.     This
> > DOES involve some code changes as the Jetty packages and stuff have
> > changed. Thus, the http-jetty transport would be incompatible with Jetty
> > 6.   However, it would give us some potential new features such as
> > support for continuations on HTTPs. (I think)
> > 
> > 2) Spring - should we use 3.0.0 instead of 2.5.6?    I think the answer
> > for this is "go ahead".   We've already have profiles to test this and
> > the same code seems to work OK with 2.5.6 and 3.0.0.   Just want to
> > double check with folks though.
> > 
> > I'd like to hear peoples thoughts on those.
> > 
> > 
> > --
> > Daniel Kulp
> > dkulp@apache.org
> > http://dankulp.com/blog

-- 
Daniel Kulp
dkulp@apache.org
http://dankulp.com/blog

Mime
View raw message