cxf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Bosschaert <david.bosscha...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: CXF-DOSGi passing the OSGi Remote Services and Remote Service Admin CT
Date Fri, 04 Jun 2010 11:59:58 GMT
On 4 June 2010 12:55, Sergey Beryozkin <sberyozkin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>
>> >Having some properties in the CXF space "org.apache.cxf" seems to be
>> > totally compliant ? Then they can be 'inherited' by cxf.ws, cxf.rs.
>>
>> Not entirely sure what you mean here, but a 'reverse domain' name is
>> used here to avoid overlap between two technologies that are unaware
>> of each other. Just like in Java Package names. So using just 'cxf.ws'
>> is a shorter but not entirely compliant.
>>
>Well, I just was lazy typing 'org.apache'. Basically what I meant was that
> using a property such
> as 'org.apache.cxf.something' when configuring the service (soap/rest) using
> does not seem like breaking the compliance rules

Well, actually it does break compliance as the spec says that the
properties should be called:
<configuration-type>.something

Given that the configuration type is called org.apache.cxf.ws the
property should be called org.apache.cxf.ws.<something>

Cheers,

David

Mime
View raw message