Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cxf-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 44557 invoked from network); 6 Mar 2010 21:43:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Mar 2010 21:43:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 26447 invoked by uid 500); 6 Mar 2010 21:42:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cxf-dev-archive@cxf.apache.org Received: (qmail 26392 invoked by uid 500); 6 Mar 2010 21:42:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cxf.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cxf.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cxf.apache.org Received: (qmail 26384 invoked by uid 99); 6 Mar 2010 21:42:49 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 06 Mar 2010 21:42:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of bimargulies@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.41 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.41] (HELO mail-ww0-f41.google.com) (74.125.82.41) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 06 Mar 2010 21:42:44 +0000 Received: by wwg30 with SMTP id 30so2004267wwg.0 for ; Sat, 06 Mar 2010 13:42:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=O+80g9c9L4N5HEsQ/gaGJCTPqRxMNAlNJIRZ+go1Wg8=; b=Ih2CFPUjyKOWQGrdA5C++exaHJZfEy0lccYFJopmR22j7uE0BJSA1nuiHKxz8R71vM uXiR7WwuHO75baDN5Dyud/kAdesOmncflX2ViKZpqVcGb4e55jvoknAZr7AqhzJoWYvb njVM/FLSdTDtQ7RSWX1NY6SEY1rpR568vnsIc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=I219iuZ7oL/gf/LmqnErElCvU5FGm5oSnaFj+HavbG2qymVIlCTQ5TKALvI9g9xN+4 dl2lXQslc8cIZ+4I2xZydTfKe10Ua0jRmbILaBAdkmMLAqviIlwo7RtdDTh82n/vx4p7 aGlWAONDLQf13Smn14BqXUglJ78NGWLvJtSk8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.88.71 with SMTP id z49mr1365328wee.90.1267911743135; Sat, 06 Mar 2010 13:42:23 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2010 16:42:23 -0500 Message-ID: <61b5d9411003061342m502ef2ecube72b8864b6f77fa@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Possible neatening in distribution From: Benson Margulies To: CXF Dev Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6dab0ec0e5ef1048128b5c4 --0016e6dab0ec0e5ef1048128b5c4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Having shamelessly cribbed various maven tricks from CXF into some other project, I recently learned something. Maven 'builds' a parent project before building its children. As a result, it's somewhat unclear why the cxf distribution works at all. I propose to split it, moving bundle and manifest either up to top-level or to be children of a new directory, so that distribution can just depend on them and the order of build operations will be clear. --0016e6dab0ec0e5ef1048128b5c4--