Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cxf.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@cxf.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <0cba01caab22$5710ff90$1f02050a@emea.progress.com>
From: Sergey Beryozkin <sberyozk@progress.com>
To: <dev@cxf.apache.org>, <rickmcg@gmail.com>
References: <d5d04a31002101232r4ec607c5m8c4256e38618285c@mail.gmail.com>
 <19e0530f1002101240t223dd0b3p247e62248efac154@mail.gmail.com>
 <OF19B3B0BC.224AEFB6-ON872576C6.0071BEF3-862576C6.0071F29A@us.ibm.com>
 <19e0530f1002101250m241774ebmb46430ed15132713@mail.gmail.com>
 <d5d04a31002101307k20b4a5cax7cf6374c20d1f651@mail.gmail.com>
 <4B73DF00.6060507@gmail.com>
 <cfdb37fb1002110547n551e4bd5p3c609b004d2a8044@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Apache Licensed JAX-RS Spec API JAR
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 13:58:49 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi Eoghan,

the resulting artifact has an OSGI Locator embedded. This may not be that bad in itself, but it includes some extra bits which 
non-OSGI consumers won't need and as briefly discussed on the Jersey list, it will 'force' all OSGI users which will depend on it to 
rely on a specific solution (which is good but it is a specific one nonetheless) to do with the use of the OsgiLocator...

cheers, Sergey

Have you considered just using the ServiceMix versions of the JSR-311 spec?

Code here:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/servicemix/smx4/specs/trunk/jsr311-api-1.0/
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/servicemix/smx4/specs/trunk/jsr311-api-1.1/

Artefacts here:
http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/servicemix/specs/org.apache.servicemix.specs.jsr311-api-1.0/
http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/servicemix/specs/org.apache.servicemix.specs.jsr311-api-1.1/

These are Apache licensed.

Cheers,
Eoghan

On 11 February 2010 10:42, Rick McGuire <rickmcg@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 2/10/2010 4:07 PM, Bryant Luk wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> We (some followers to Wink dev mailing list) were wondering if the CXF
>> dev community would be interested in helping to contribute/consume a
>> JAX-RS 1.0/1.1 API JAR for Geronimo's spec jars that were Apache
>> licensed.  I couldn't find an Apache licensed version of the JSR-311
>> spec.  I see other communities that have implemented JSR specs are
>> using Apache licensed of their specs.  I don't know the exact
>> procedure to contribute a spec api jar to Geronimo, but I don't think
>> this would take too much effort considering that most of the JAX-RS
>> spec is annotation/interface based with very few actual classes.
>>
>>
>
> Creating a JAX-RS spec jar is definitely in our plans, but it just hasn't
> happened yet because we haven't started looking at integrating this support
> yet.  We even have a Jira open for this particular task:
>
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5095
>
> If you'd like to contribute code for this, the easiest way would be to
> attach a patch to that Jira issue.
>
> Rick
>
>
>  On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Davanum Srinivas<davanum@gmail.com>
>>  wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Got it. i mis-remembered seeing a jax-rs api jar from geronimo. Looks
>>> like CXF uses the CDDL jar as well. May be we should ping them to see
>>> if they would be interested.
>>>
>>> +1 from me.
>>>
>>> -- dims
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Nicholas L Gallardo
>>> <nlgallar@us.ibm.com>  wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> +1 from me Bryant.
>>>>
>>>> There isn't a JSR spec for JAX-RS available in Geronimo as of yet. I
>>>> don't know where they've come from in the past, but I'm assuming they've
>>>> been contributed by the relevant technical teams/communities.
>>>>
>>>> The API jar currently in the maven repo is CDDL licensed.
>>>>
>>>> -Nick
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Davanum Srinivas ---02/10/2010 02:40:56 PM---Why can't we use the JSR
>>>> spec from geronimo? :)
>>>>
>>>> Davanum Srinivas<davanum@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>> 02/10/2010 02:40 PM
>>>>
>>>> Please respond to
>>>> wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>>
>>>> To
>>>> wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>> cc
>>>>
>>>> Subject
>>>> Re: Apache Licensed JAX-RS Spec API JAR
>>>> Why can't we use the JSR spec from geronimo? :)
>>>>
>>>> -- dims
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 3:32 PM, Bryant Luk<bryant.luk@gmail.com>
>>>>  wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I see that several Apache projects based on JSR specs have geronimo
>>>>> (Apache licensed) versions of the spec.  Should we also consider
>>>>> contributing one for JAX-RS 1.0 and 1.1?  I don't see one in the Maven
>>>>> repository that's Apache licensed.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>