cxf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alessio Soldano <asold...@redhat.com>
Subject Re: Thoughts about dropping support for 2.1.x......
Date Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:07:04 GMT
Fine with me too.
Cheers
Alessio

Benson Margulies wrote:
> I'm +1 for turning off 2.1 support.
>
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 10:05 AM, Daniel Kulp <dkulp@apache.org> wrote:
>
>   
>> Question for everyone.....
>>
>> What are peoples thoughts about making 2.1.9 (in January) the last of the
>> 2.1.x line?
>>
>> 2.2.x will have been out for 10 months by then so users definitely should
>> have
>> had plenty of time to migrate.   2.2.x is generally a simple migration from
>> 2.1.x.   I think most of the other major open source projects that were
>> tracking 2.1.x have already moved onto 2.2.x.   ServiceMix, Camel, JBoss,
>> etc...     The remaining projects that are using 2.1.x seem to be stuck on
>> a
>> particular version (like Mule stuck on 2.1.3) and not "tracking" the fixes
>> anyway.
>>
>> The main migration issue from 2.1.x to 2.2.x is the JAX-RS version (0.8 ->
>> 1.0).   However, we aren't fixing any of the JAX-RS issues on 2.1.x anyway.
>> Thus, that's not a real reason.  If you are using JAX-RS, you definitely
>> want
>> the compliant implementation in 2.2.
>>
>> Anyway, making 2.1.9 the end of the line should then make it such that when
>> 2.3 is ready (hopefully in Q1), we can just keep 2 fixes branches active.
>>
>> Thoughts?  Comments?
>>
>> --
>> Daniel Kulp
>> dkulp@apache.org
>> http://www.dankulp.com/blog
>>
>>     
>
>   


-- 
Alessio Soldano
Web Service Lead, JBoss


Mime
View raw message