Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cxf.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@cxf.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of asoldano@redhat.com designates
 209.132.183.28 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <4AE71988.4020202@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 17:02:16 +0100
From: Alessio Soldano <asoldano@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090105)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@cxf.apache.org
Subject: Re: Ideas for 2.2.5 and end of year
References: <200910231544.11030.dkulp@apache.org>
In-Reply-To: <200910231544.11030.dkulp@apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I'm fine with a 2.2.5 happening soon.
Cheers
Alessio

Daniel Kulp wrote:
> Just wanted to start a discussion about 2.2.5.   I know it's a bit early since 
> 2.2.4 was just released 2 weeks ago, but holiday season is fast approaching so 
> I thought I throw an idea out there.
>
> We've done a TON of work resolving JIRA issues in the last two weeks.  We 
> already have over 30 resolved issues on the 2.2.x branch which is outstanding 
> work.   That's already more than we had for 2.1.7.      Thus, I was kind of 
> thinking of doing a 2.2.5 sooner than the normal 8-10 weeks.   
>
> 8-10 weeks from the last release would put it at about mid December, which 
> kind of sucks due to holidays and such.    I know I'm going to be in and out 
> throughout December (I have too many "use or lose" vacation days) and I know 
> others will be in and out as well.    Thus, it's not really a good time to 
> prepare a release.    Thus, I was thinking maybe do 2.2.5 in mid November and 
> then 2.2.6 would then be in January sometime.   (and then I'm hoping 2.3 would 
> be in Feb/Mar, but that still remains to be seen if stuff is "ready") 
>
> I don't think there is much push for 2.1.8 for November.  Only 9 of the 
> resolved issues were pushable back to 2.1.x.   Thus, I'd probably skip 2.1.8 
> and just do that in January with 2.2.6.   Besides, I'd like to slow down 2.1.x 
> releases with the thought of stopping them sometime soon as well since 2.2.x 
> is generally a simple migration from 2.1.x.
>
> Does that make sense to people?   Any objections?  Thoughts?  Comments?
>
>   


-- 
Alessio Soldano
Web Service Lead, JBoss