Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cxf-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 19717 invoked from network); 29 Sep 2009 15:45:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Sep 2009 15:45:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 98660 invoked by uid 500); 29 Sep 2009 15:45:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cxf-dev-archive@cxf.apache.org Received: (qmail 98575 invoked by uid 500); 29 Sep 2009 15:45:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cxf.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cxf.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cxf.apache.org Received: (qmail 98565 invoked by uid 99); 29 Sep 2009 15:45:34 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:45:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ejfuhr@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.198 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.223.198] (HELO mail-iw0-f198.google.com) (209.85.223.198) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:45:25 +0000 Received: by iwn36 with SMTP id 36so1247510iwn.24 for ; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 08:45:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=zJdUGGijkIG0Q5QebnfRLZoz02zjYQVMGG65vuRvDm8=; b=UULm5GCm8Fh2gJtN+D0x4pVOwS3pPXrGiU0vjrVKDpWHEKufN6ojbIgovdrtToYVas PbCfXLmvMRhNEnCZ6jMFUh3Z610Ak0Yn/Qq8G6sQE8eP05oo3NToO3aF2ZT39vU0HEeh CFSwYmn2RypFkk+M2GMVz5vxj/L9/8uIB65xU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=R27POji/FjS1C0p4m2KbuKuRSIkLQz0EgvglVTgW7K7TNMlizaKQnWcjwnKsb86hmJ 6nVx7dO3szq6ZuynorD8uISWZao9AKWgukvOO5k9fR5X8ViCqwhAdegkiNY8Lp/Y0Ojm AnnoKwfabg8jHb9NulKIl294bVr70fMJcUnf4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.6.87 with SMTP id 23mr9035185iby.19.1254239104138; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 08:45:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <61b5d9410909290830of89cd23j9be43d751b8a94ed@mail.gmail.com> References: <61b5d9410909290830of89cd23j9be43d751b8a94ed@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 10:45:04 -0500 Message-ID: <5ae04caf0909290845v379bffddi2a7badb0c1927ad1@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Gmail thinks we're spam From: John Fuhr To: dev@cxf.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015176f1cf843ff480474b94cce X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0015176f1cf843ff480474b94cce Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 here's a reply-to-all from a gmail. i got your note in the in box On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 10:30 AM, Benson Margulies wrote: > Some JIRA emails are getting flagged as phishing due, I guess, to > discrepancies between from and reply-to? Anyone else seeing this? > --0015176f1cf843ff480474b94cce--