cxf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Merging Aegis updates to 2.2.x
Date Tue, 08 Sep 2009 19:16:25 GMT
On Tue September 8 2009 12:58:15 pm Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
> Ok, I'd prefer to merge Revision 811687 to 2.2.x but have only JAXRS
>  related changes commited to 2.2.x, with Aegis related ones (including
>  updates to AegisJSONProvider) being left out. Dan, would you agree ?

Yep.  I agree.   The major changes that may affect people should just stay on 
trunk.   It may mean a little more work to get that revision merged back, but 
it's definitely best to do so.

Dan  

> 
> cheers, Sergey
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Benson Margulies" <bimargulies@gmail.com>
> To: <dev@cxf.apache.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 5:44 PM
> Subject: Re: Merging Aegis updates to 2.2.x
> 
> > Well. You asked me to tackle the collection issues. I looked into them,
> > and concluded that radical surgery on Aegis was needed. And that happened
> > after I had done radical surgery to introduce flat='true'.
> >
> > Now, all of this should be compatible. However, I'm not impressed with
> > the test coverage we have, based on previous complaints of Aegis
> > compatibility issues. My conservative inclination is to say that this
> > stuff is not backporting, and 2.2 JAX-RS+Aegis is what it is, and will
> > only change for 2.3. On the other extreme, you and Dan could backport all
> > the pending Aegis changes: flat='true' and also the changes for generics
> > that I made to try to make JAX-RS work better. And, if by some chance
> > someone undertakes 'unqualified', that will be yet another layer of
> > complex changes.
> >
> > All of this highlights a tension between 'do development in trunk and
> > merge back' and 'make radical changes in trunk.' Dan?
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 12:04 PM, Sergey Beryozkin 
<sberyozk@progress.com>wrote:
> >> Hi Benson
> >>
> >> Revision 811687 contains both Aegis and JAXRS changes so I'd like to get
> >> it merged to 2.2.x...
> >> Can you let me know what other Aegis-related changes need to be merged
> >> to 2.2.x first before the revision 811687 can be merged to 2.2.x and
> >> compiled there ?
> >> thanks, Sergey
> 

-- 
Daniel Kulp
dkulp@apache.org
http://www.dankulp.com/blog

Mime
View raw message