Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cxf.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@cxf.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jmholtzman@gmail.com designates
 209.85.219.210 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type;
        b=lqVyV52Tdwj14FipQWSwy/6up9bi8kMMBn0EaJ696IZZ7VQo7elsAUKa6l1ivG04hd
         5Jji1EXzK0YRJJJ+jUEFp98trrH30eCvXP91uzAVY7SSIehDiSAGIKEnnXiz9sV5GwDK
         l5ezxCb7A0fExMkSZmFFTpIfHWceJGoFKE7tc=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: jmholtzman@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <25138636.post@talk.nabble.com>
References: 
 <D9D39D1E52C5514C94DE9B5E928C72DB02FCDDC6@MAIL02.bedford.progress.com>
	<ffb641a30906241825lc83db0av9e46b28a1aade7a7@mail.gmail.com>
	<01c401ca227c$76f99e40$1f02050a@emea.progress.com>
 <ffb641a30908221209q26e50b99p4ea1af0b623fac41@mail.gmail.com>
	<25138636.post@talk.nabble.com>
From: Josh Holtzman <jholtzman@berkeley.edu>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 18:02:03 +0200
Message-ID: <ffb641a30908260902i1ec05327l655338996e73ecb7@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Integrating JAX-RS runtime into DOSGi
To: dev@cxf.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485f6ccba9d59ee04720d9359

--001485f6ccba9d59ee04720d9359
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Great, thanks Sergey.  I just tried this, and wasn't able to read/write an
arbitrary object.

I've registered a MessageBodyReader and a MessageBodyWriter (actually, the
same object) like so:

    FooXmlReaderWriter fooReaderWriter = new FooXmlReaderWriter();
    context.registerService(MessageBodyReader.class.getName(),
fooReaderWriter, null);
    context.registerService(MessageBodyWriter.class.getName(),
fooReaderWriter, null);

I see that these services are in fact registered:

-----------------------------------------------
objectClass = javax.ws.rs.ext.MessageBodyReader
service.id = 41
----
objectClass = javax.ws.rs.ext.MessageBodyWriter
service.id = 42
----

But when I try to access a Foo via JAX-RS, I get this:

[9853182@qtp-998044-0 - /inspection/rest/foo] WARN
org.apache.cxf.jaxrs.interceptor.JAXRSOutInterceptor - .No message body
writer found for response class : Foo.

Please let me know if I misunderstood the recipe for registering JAX-RS
providers.  I'll be out of the office until Monday, and will start digging
into the CXF code to see what's going on when I return.

Many thanks,
Josh


On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 7:21 PM, Sergey Beryozkin <sergey.beryozkin@iona.com
> wrote:

>
> Hi Josh
>
> I've updated the JAX-RS layer in DOSGi such that it will now discover JAXRS
> (and CXF specific providers) which have been registered as (global) OSGI
> services. At the moment I've decided not to use a ServiceTracker and
> instead
> a calling BundleContext is asked to exercise a filter expression which
> should catch JAXRS MessageBodyReader, MessageBodyWriter, ExceptionMapper,
> as
> well as CXF RequestHandler, ResponseHandler & ParameterHandler. I'll
> attempt
> to optimize it later on....
>
> One can disable such queries for such providers and also insist that only
> those global providers which have identified themselves (through a specific
> property) that they will work reliably with CXF can be used.
>
> Alternatively, one can register an array of service/endpoint -specific
> providers by using "org.apache.cxf.rs.provider" property, when registering
> an application service.
> Will document it tomorrow
>
> Give it a try please whenever you get a chance and let me know if it works
> for you
>
> cheers, Sergey
>
>
>
> Josh Holtzman wrote:
> >
> > Hi Sergey. Yes, we are using JAXB with both JAX-RS and JAX-WS endpoints.
> >
> > Josh
> >
> > On Aug 21, 2009 6:28 PM, "Sergey Beryozkin" <sberyozk@progress.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Josh
> >
> > Can you please let me know if JAXB is being used for your JAX-RS
> endpoints
> > ?
> > I've spotted that for HTTP Service based JAX-RS endpoints no
> AegisProvider
> > is being set - I'would actually like JAXB being used by default for JAXRS
> > endpoints which will be consistent with the expectations of JAX-RS users
> > in
> > general - but I'd like to confirm first that JAXB is working ok in your
> > case...
> >
> > thanks, Sergey
> >
> >> Sergey, > Thanks again for the detailed documentation you've provided in
> > this thread. > I was ab...
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/RE%3A-Integrating-JAX-RS-runtime-into-DOSGi-tp24127832p25138636.html
> Sent from the cxf-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>

--001485f6ccba9d59ee04720d9359--