Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cxf.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@cxf.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of willem.jiang@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.198.244 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
         :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=O81G13QzLdKrn7bhnTxBnVkdOWRG1FGLPJ2MMBxCN3wF4Kic4DWDiEVYux0QwIN4kR
         tSh7YShgaqrK9HDIw0Ax1h+TPKU8pDSH/bxFarxUn1K+26omoJ20CGQxawxwXQg/mnVB
         TU94Gmk1csyUH3SbaGd+u3lduP8asX98QQ+Sg=
Message-ID: <4A51A168.6080700@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2009 15:02:00 +0800
From: Willem Jiang <willem.jiang@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Macintosh/20090605)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@cxf.apache.org
Subject: Re: Properties Overriding in WSDL usage
References: <4A4E2AD4.4080800@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4A4E2AD4.4080800@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GB2312
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi,

I think this is a bug of CXF, if the user define the extension in the
service and binding,
 we should use the service's value.

Willem

liucong wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> In the
> SOAP/JMS(http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-soapjms-20081121/#wsdl-11-properties).
> If a property is specified at multiple levels, the most specific setting
> will take precedence (port first, then service, then binding).
> 
> But I invetigate the code of CXF. I find someting int
> org.apache.cxf.service.model.EndpointInfo.getTraversedExtensor(T
> defaultValue, Class<T> type):
> @Override
> public <T> T getTraversedExtensor(T defaultValue, Class<T> type) {
> T value = getExtensor(type);
> 
> if (value == null) {
> if (value == null && binding != null) {
> value = binding.getExtensor(type);
> }
> 
> if (service != null && value == null) {
> value = service.getExtensor(type);
> }
> 
> if (value == null) {
> value = defaultValue;
> }
> }
> 
> return value;
> }
> 
> The code shou that:port first, then binding, then service.
> 
> Now. Which is right?
> 
> thanks.
>